Abstract C047: A latent class analysis of NHANES cancer survivors reveals disparities in cognitive impairment

Abstract Cognitive impairment is an important factor affecting quality of life in the cancer survivor population. Specific treatments (radiation, chemo, targeted therapy), anxiety and pain can all contribute to decreased cognitive function. While analysis of disparities associated with cognitive impairment have been performed in the general population, similar studies have not yet been done in the adult cancer survivor population. This study had the following aims: a) to identify subgroups of cognitive impairment using a series of cognitive tests performed in 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and b) to identify factors associated with worse performing subgroups of cognitive impairment in an adult cancer survivor population. We performed a latent class analysis of the 2011-2014 NHANES cognitive questionnaire, which includes tests of word recall, digit symbol, and animal fluency tests: measures where poorer scores have been linked to dementia. The cohort comprised of 511 cancer survivors of age 55 and older (N=305). Among the cancer types represented in the cohort, Whites had relatively more melanoma, Hispanics had more breast cancer, and African Americans more prostate cancer. Using the poLCA package in R, we defined three latent classes corresponding to mild (CERAD Average 9.1/10 words after 3 trials, Animal Fluency of 19.7, Digit Substitution of 57.3), moderate (CERAD Average 7.7/10 words after 3 trials, Animal Fluency of 16.6, Digit Symbol of 46.4) and severe cognitive impairment (CERAD Average 5.6/10 words after 3 trials, Animal Fluency of 13.1, Digit Symbol of 31.7). We next performed multinomial regression to identify factors linked with moderate and severe cognitive impairment, examining age, sex, income, education, employment, alcohol/tobacco use and general health. We found that Nonwhite cancer survivors showed a significantly higher risk of moderate (OR 2.4 (1.0-5.4), p<0.05) and severe cognitive impairment (OR 4.1(1.4-11.5), p<0.01) compared to their White counterparts. An exploratory analysis of ethnicity also revealed a trend towards increased risk of moderate and severe cognitive impairment in African-Americans (OR 2.2/3.6), Hispanics (OR 1.8/ 3.9) and Multi-Racial/Other (OR 4.7/7.4) compared to their White counterparts. Female sex was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of moderate (OR 0.39 (0.19-0.83), p<0.05) and severe cognitive impairment (OR 0.19 (0.07-0.53), p<0.05). Other factors associated with severe cognitive impairment included being a college graduate (OR 0.18 (0.04-0.82), p<0.05), age>75 (OR 2.5 (1.1-5.6), p<0.05), retired status (OR 5.8(1.5-22.8), p<0.05), and unemployed status (OR 13.8 (1.6-116.8), p<0.05). Our work suggests that within cancer survivors, non-white ethnicity is an independent contributor to severe cognitive impairment, even when controlling for other common socioeconomic factors. Future work will examine aspects of survivorship care that may drive these differences. Citation Format: Cody Ramin, Jessica P Li, Kekoa Taparra, Geetanjali D Datta, Lene HS Veiga, Gretchen L Gierach, Robert Haile, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, Jacqueline B Vo. A latent class analysis of NHANES cancer survivors reveals disparities in cognitive impairment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C047.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.disp24-c047
Primary Topic
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract C047: A latent class analysis of NHANES cancer survivors reveals disparities in cognitive impairment

Melinda Laine Hsu, Chi Wen, Rohit Rao, Hui Xie et al.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
article

Abstract C047: A latent class analysis of NHANES cancer survivors reveals disparities in cognitive impairment

Melinda Laine Hsu, Chi Wen, Rohit Rao, Hui Xie, Qian Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cognitive impairment is an important factor affecting quality of life in the cancer survivor population. Specific treatments (radiation, chemo, targeted therapy), anxiety and pain can all contribute to decreased cognitive function. While analysis of disparities associated with cognitive impairment have been performed in the general population, similar studies have not yet been done in the adult cancer survivor population. This study had the following aims: a) to identify subgroups of cognitive impairment using a series of cognitive tests performed in 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and b) to identify factors associated with worse performing subgroups of cognitive impairment in an adult cancer survivor population. We performed a latent class analysis of the 2011-2014 NHANES cognitive questionnaire, which includes tests of word recall, digit symbol, and animal fluency tests: measures where poorer scores have been linked to dementia. The cohort comprised of 511 cancer survivors of age 55 and older (N=305). Among the cancer types represented in the cohort, Whites had relatively more melanoma, Hispanics had more breast cancer, and African Americans more prostate cancer. Using the poLCA package in R, we defined three latent classes corresponding to mild (CERAD Average 9.1/10 words after 3 trials, Animal Fluency of 19.7, Digit Substitution of 57.3), moderate (CERAD Average 7.7/10 words after 3 trials, Animal Fluency of 16.6, Digit Symbol of 46.4) and severe cognitive impairment (CERAD Average 5.6/10 words after 3 trials, Animal Fluency of 13.1, Digit Symbol of 31.7). We next performed multinomial regression to identify factors linked with moderate and severe cognitive impairment, examining age, sex, income, education, employment, alcohol/tobacco use and general health. We found that Nonwhite cancer survivors showed a significantly higher risk of moderate (OR 2.4 (1.0-5.4), p<0.05) and severe cognitive impairment (OR 4.1(1.4-11.5), p<0.01) compared to their White counterparts. An exploratory analysis of ethnicity also revealed a trend towards increased risk of moderate and severe cognitive impairment in African-Americans (OR 2.2/3.6), Hispanics (OR 1.8/ 3.9) and Multi-Racial/Other (OR 4.7/7.4) compared to their White counterparts. Female sex was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of moderate (OR 0.39 (0.19-0.83), p<0.05) and severe cognitive impairment (OR 0.19 (0.07-0.53), p<0.05). Other factors associated with severe cognitive impairment included being a college graduate (OR 0.18 (0.04-0.82), p<0.05), age>75 (OR 2.5 (1.1-5.6), p<0.05), retired status (OR 5.8(1.5-22.8), p<0.05), and unemployed status (OR 13.8 (1.6-116.8), p<0.05). Our work suggests that within cancer survivors, non-white ethnicity is an independent contributor to severe cognitive impairment, even when controlling for other common socioeconomic factors. Future work will examine aspects of survivorship care that may drive these differences. Citation Format: Cody Ramin, Jessica P Li, Kekoa Taparra, Geetanjali D Datta, Lene HS Veiga, Gretchen L Gierach, Robert Haile, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez, Jacqueline B Vo. A latent class analysis of NHANES cancer survivors reveals disparities in cognitive impairment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C047.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionVol. 33(9_Supplement)
Mount Sinai Health System (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.