Size isn't everything: Understanding the relationship between police workforce and crime problems

If and how policing affects crime has long been studied. On the relationship between police force size and crime, different authors come to different conclusions. This study examines the relationship between police resourcing, including workforce size, structure and stability over time using data for 42 police forces in the UK over a 13-year period. We construct two novel panel datasets. The first comprises measures of police workforce Size, Structure and Stability . The second provides measures of both crime frequency and crime severity. Issues of endogeneity make the modelling of the police-crime association complicated. Consequently, we analyse the data using a panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model which is capable of forecasting a temporal sequence of the interdependencies between police-crime relationships. Changes in total police personnel play an important role in reducing both crime frequency and severity, but the findings are more nuanced than this. Results highlight that the structure and stability of police organisations are important although these impacts are not always the same for crime volume and crime severity. We find that increases in frontline (non-sworn) support staff are associated with reductions in crime, while turnover rates of police staff are associated with increases in crime. In contrast, changes to the number of sworn police officers do not appear to be a good predictor of crime volume. The findings suggest that investment in frontline support staff and the development of strategies to retain skills and knowledge by reducing staff turnover may be efficient approaches for Police Forces to maximise the impact on crime of their workforce in resource-pressed policing settings. While previous research has found that police force size has a limited effect on crime, our findings indicate that more nuanced measurements of police resourcing are necessary to understand how police impact upon crime risk. The idea of police forces using basic officer-to-population ratios to make staffing decisions appears outdated and over-simplistic. • Examines dynamic interactions between police workforce structure and crime. • Utilises panel vector autoregression model to analyse bidirectional causal dynamics in policing and crime data. • Highlights the bidirectional influence between police staffing decisions and crime. • Finds frontline support staff and lower turnover reduce crime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Criminal Justice
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102291
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Size isn't everything: Understanding the relationship between police workforce and crime problems

Kate Bowers, Eon Kim, Shane D. Johnson, Daniel Birks
7 citations
Journal of Criminal Justice
Crime Patterns and Interventions
7.92
article

Size isn't everything: Understanding the relationship between police workforce and crime problems

Kate Bowers, Eon Kim, Shane D. Johnson, Daniel Birks
article en
7 citations

Abstract

If and how policing affects crime has long been studied. On the relationship between police force size and crime, different authors come to different conclusions. This study examines the relationship between police resourcing, including workforce size, structure and stability over time using data for 42 police forces in the UK over a 13-year period. We construct two novel panel datasets. The first comprises measures of police workforce Size, Structure and Stability . The second provides measures of both crime frequency and crime severity. Issues of endogeneity make the modelling of the police-crime association complicated. Consequently, we analyse the data using a panel vector autoregression (PVAR) model which is capable of forecasting a temporal sequence of the interdependencies between police-crime relationships. Changes in total police personnel play an important role in reducing both crime frequency and severity, but the findings are more nuanced than this. Results highlight that the structure and stability of police organisations are important although these impacts are not always the same for crime volume and crime severity. We find that increases in frontline (non-sworn) support staff are associated with reductions in crime, while turnover rates of police staff are associated with increases in crime. In contrast, changes to the number of sworn police officers do not appear to be a good predictor of crime volume. The findings suggest that investment in frontline support staff and the development of strategies to retain skills and knowledge by reducing staff turnover may be efficient approaches for Police Forces to maximise the impact on crime of their workforce in resource-pressed policing settings. While previous research has found that police force size has a limited effect on crime, our findings indicate that more nuanced measurements of police resourcing are necessary to understand how police impact upon crime risk. The idea of police forces using basic officer-to-population ratios to make staffing decisions appears outdated and over-simplistic. • Examines dynamic interactions between police workforce structure and crime. • Utilises panel vector autoregression model to analyse bidirectional causal dynamics in policing and crime data. • Highlights the bidirectional influence between police staffing decisions and crime. • Finds frontline support staff and lower turnover reduce crime.

Journal of Criminal JusticeVol. 95
University of Leeds (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University College London (GB)
Alan Turing Institute, UK Research and Innovation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.