An Examination of Business Ethics Attitudes Through Major Philosophical Categories

This study aims to assess the attitudes of associate degree students, who are prospective employees in the business world, towards work ethics. It investigates whether these attitudes differ based on various factors, including gender, department, and work experience. Additionally, the study evaluates participants' attitudes through the lens of major business ethics philosophies—Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, Ethical Relativism, Moral Objectivism, and Legalism. The findings indicate a significant difference in business ethics attitudes between students enrolled in administrative programs and those in tourism programs. However, no clear distinction was observed in the participants' business ethics attitudes when analyzed according to different ethical philosophies. Following statistical analysis, attitudes towards business ethics were categorized into two factors: "benefit-based business ethics" and "behavior-based business ethics." The results demonstrate that male students exhibit higher benefit-based work ethic attitudes compared to their female counterparts. Furthermore, students with no job experience tend to exhibit stronger self-interest-based business ethics attitudes. Conversely, students from administrative and tourism programs display distinct business ethics attitudes, influenced by both benefit and behavior considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Management and Administration
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29064/ijma.1522477
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Examination of Business Ethics Attitudes Through Major Philosophical Categories

Esin Firuzan, Gaye Onan
International Journal of Management and Administration
Ethics in Business and Education
article

An Examination of Business Ethics Attitudes Through Major Philosophical Categories

Esin Firuzan, Gaye Onan
article en

Abstract

This study aims to assess the attitudes of associate degree students, who are prospective employees in the business world, towards work ethics. It investigates whether these attitudes differ based on various factors, including gender, department, and work experience. Additionally, the study evaluates participants' attitudes through the lens of major business ethics philosophies—Machiavellianism, Social Darwinism, Ethical Relativism, Moral Objectivism, and Legalism. The findings indicate a significant difference in business ethics attitudes between students enrolled in administrative programs and those in tourism programs. However, no clear distinction was observed in the participants' business ethics attitudes when analyzed according to different ethical philosophies. Following statistical analysis, attitudes towards business ethics were categorized into two factors: "benefit-based business ethics" and "behavior-based business ethics." The results demonstrate that male students exhibit higher benefit-based work ethic attitudes compared to their female counterparts. Furthermore, students with no job experience tend to exhibit stronger self-interest-based business ethics attitudes. Conversely, students from administrative and tourism programs display distinct business ethics attitudes, influenced by both benefit and behavior considerations.

International Journal of Management and AdministrationVol. 8(16)
Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institute (US), Mersin Üniversitesi (TR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.