Deutsche und italienische „geschlechtersensible Sprache“ zwischen rechtlicher und institutioneller Kommunikation

The article explores the use of human nouns in a corpus of directive texts (legal texts on gender equality and on equality of people with disabilities) and the conceptualisation of gender-sensitive language in a corpus of advisory texts (i. e. in manuals on legal and administrative language and in gender guidelines of universities) produced in Germany and in Italy. The contrastive analyses of the directive and advisory texts are closely linked: namely, gender guidelines that universities make available on their web pages refer to legal texts and to manuals. After theoretical and methodological clarifications, the article reports the main results of the two analyses, which can be summarised as follows: - Directive texts: both in Italian legal texts on gender equality and on equality of people with disabilities there is a high percentage of masculine forms, while the German legal text on gender equality has a high percentage of feminine nouns and the German legal texts on equality of people with disabilities have a high percentage of gender-inclusive nouns (such as epicene nouns). - Advisory texts: German manuals on legal and administrative texts recommend the use of gender-sensible language, particularly when referring to natural persons, i. e. avoiding the use of generic masculines. Italian manuals on administrative texts recommend avoiding generic masculines. German and Italian recommendations also share a binary view. The situation is different in advisory texts produced by Universities: German guidelines (although not all of them) give both advice on binary forms and on overcoming this linguistic binarism, whereas Italian ones recommend binary forms and focus on the construction of feminine nouns. The use of masculine nouns for men and feminine nouns for women, neutral forms, and alternative constructions (such as passive forms), on the other hand, is a common feature of German and Italian guidelines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Linguistik Online
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.132.11447
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Linguistic research and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deutsche und italienische „geschlechtersensible Sprache“ zwischen rechtlicher und institutioneller Kommunikation

Valentina Crestani, Marina Brambilla
2 citations
Linguistik Online
Linguistic research and analysis
5.56
article

Deutsche und italienische „geschlechtersensible Sprache“ zwischen rechtlicher und institutioneller Kommunikation

Valentina Crestani, Marina Brambilla
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The article explores the use of human nouns in a corpus of directive texts (legal texts on gender equality and on equality of people with disabilities) and the conceptualisation of gender-sensitive language in a corpus of advisory texts (i. e. in manuals on legal and administrative language and in gender guidelines of universities) produced in Germany and in Italy. The contrastive analyses of the directive and advisory texts are closely linked: namely, gender guidelines that universities make available on their web pages refer to legal texts and to manuals. After theoretical and methodological clarifications, the article reports the main results of the two analyses, which can be summarised as follows: - Directive texts: both in Italian legal texts on gender equality and on equality of people with disabilities there is a high percentage of masculine forms, while the German legal text on gender equality has a high percentage of feminine nouns and the German legal texts on equality of people with disabilities have a high percentage of gender-inclusive nouns (such as epicene nouns). - Advisory texts: German manuals on legal and administrative texts recommend the use of gender-sensible language, particularly when referring to natural persons, i. e. avoiding the use of generic masculines. Italian manuals on administrative texts recommend avoiding generic masculines. German and Italian recommendations also share a binary view. The situation is different in advisory texts produced by Universities: German guidelines (although not all of them) give both advice on binary forms and on overcoming this linguistic binarism, whereas Italian ones recommend binary forms and focus on the construction of feminine nouns. The use of masculine nouns for men and feminine nouns for women, neutral forms, and alternative constructions (such as passive forms), on the other hand, is a common feature of German and Italian guidelines.

Linguistik OnlineVol. 132(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Linguistic research and analysis
5.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.