Triaxial compressive behaviour of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC) and its applications in contact explosion and projectile impact analysis

Ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC) is increasingly recognised as a promising construction material in protective engineering owing to its exceptional material strength and eco-friendly characteristics. However, there is currently limited research data on the behaviour of UHPGC under complex stress states , and the applicability of some common concrete dynamic constitutive models to UHPGC requires calibration and evaluation. This paper presents an experimental study on the triaxial compression (TXC) behaviour of UHPGC under varying confining pressures with a range of 0–40 MPa. The stress-strain curves under various confinement levels and failure patterns of UHPGC are discussed. The results indicate that the peak axial stress and toughness of UHPGC increase with higher confining pressure levels, but it still exhibits noticeable softening behaviour . Under uniaxial compression, UHPGC typically fails with inclined shear and axial tensile cracks, while under TXC, particularly at confining pressures above 20 MPa, the failure mode transitions to shear failure with prominent oblique shear cracks. Additionally, existing failure criteria are calibrated to match the strength envelop of UHPGC, with the Power-law failure criterion providing the closest fitting results. Subsequently, utilising both current and pre-existing TXC data , three commonly used concrete constitutive models, including HJC, K&C and CSC, are calibrated with respect to the dominant strength parameters for UHPGC in the finite element (FE) hydrocode ANSYS/LS-DYNA. Further, numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of such three calibrated concrete models in replicating the response of UHPGC panels exposed to the contact explosion or projectile impact. The simulation results demonstrate that the K&C and CSC models effectively replicate the localised damage of UHPGC panels under contact explosions, while the HJC model more accurately simulates the depth of penetration (DOP) for thick UHPGC panels under projectile impact. • Triaxial compression behaviour of UHPGC is experimentally tested. • Existing failure criteria are calibrated to accommodate the strength envelop of UHPGC. • Strength surface parameters in K&C, CSC and HJC models are calibrated for UHPGC. • The calibrated concrete models are evaluated for simulating the response of UHPGC panels under contact explosion or projectile impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138394
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Triaxial compressive behaviour of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC) and its applications in contact explosion and projectile impact analysis

Pengfei Liu, Yu Su, Kai Liu, Jian Liu et al.
11 citations
Construction and Building Materials
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
2.87
article

Triaxial compressive behaviour of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC) and its applications in contact explosion and projectile impact analysis

Pengfei Liu, Yu Su, Kai Liu, Jian Liu, Cheng Liu, Sihao Lin
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC) is increasingly recognised as a promising construction material in protective engineering owing to its exceptional material strength and eco-friendly characteristics. However, there is currently limited research data on the behaviour of UHPGC under complex stress states , and the applicability of some common concrete dynamic constitutive models to UHPGC requires calibration and evaluation. This paper presents an experimental study on the triaxial compression (TXC) behaviour of UHPGC under varying confining pressures with a range of 0–40 MPa. The stress-strain curves under various confinement levels and failure patterns of UHPGC are discussed. The results indicate that the peak axial stress and toughness of UHPGC increase with higher confining pressure levels, but it still exhibits noticeable softening behaviour . Under uniaxial compression, UHPGC typically fails with inclined shear and axial tensile cracks, while under TXC, particularly at confining pressures above 20 MPa, the failure mode transitions to shear failure with prominent oblique shear cracks. Additionally, existing failure criteria are calibrated to match the strength envelop of UHPGC, with the Power-law failure criterion providing the closest fitting results. Subsequently, utilising both current and pre-existing TXC data , three commonly used concrete constitutive models, including HJC, K&C and CSC, are calibrated with respect to the dominant strength parameters for UHPGC in the finite element (FE) hydrocode ANSYS/LS-DYNA. Further, numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of such three calibrated concrete models in replicating the response of UHPGC panels exposed to the contact explosion or projectile impact. The simulation results demonstrate that the K&C and CSC models effectively replicate the localised damage of UHPGC panels under contact explosions, while the HJC model more accurately simulates the depth of penetration (DOP) for thick UHPGC panels under projectile impact. • Triaxial compression behaviour of UHPGC is experimentally tested. • Existing failure criteria are calibrated to accommodate the strength envelop of UHPGC. • Strength surface parameters in K&C, CSC and HJC models are calibrated for UHPGC. • The calibrated concrete models are evaluated for simulating the response of UHPGC panels under contact explosion or projectile impact.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 449
Central South University (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Yangzhou Vocational University (CN), Daye People's Hospital (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.