[First experience with robotic-assisted colorectal surgery].

Robot-assisted surgery has been available at the National Institute of Oncology since 2022. We report on the most important parameters of the colorectal robot-assisted surgery of the first 191 patients. Robotically assisted rectal surgery was compared with our previous laparoscopic and open surgical activities. Perioperative indicators of rectal cancer patients operated laparoscopically (n=225) and open (n=213) were retrospectively compared with patients operated robotically assisted (n=140). In comparison of the three groups (laparoscopic, open, robot-assisted), robotic surgery shows a significant advantage in quality of mesorectal excision (complete TME rate 77%, 72.7% and 90%, respectively), in the days of care (median 7, 9 and 5 days, respectively), hospital readmissions (8%, 16%, 6.4%), and the rate of sphincter preservation (68%, 60% and 89.5%). As a conclusion, robotic surgery is sufficiently safe from oncological point of view. It has a significant advantage in quality of lymph node dissection, shorter care, fewer hospital readmissions, partially lower morbidity rate and a higher sphincter preservation rate compared to laparoscopic and open surgeries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-09-19
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[First experience with robotic-assisted colorectal surgery].

P Mészáros, Tamás Mersich, Barna Budai, Zsolt Dubóczki et al.
PubMed
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

[First experience with robotic-assisted colorectal surgery].

P Mészáros, Tamás Mersich, Barna Budai, Zsolt Dubóczki, Kornél Mező
article en

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery has been available at the National Institute of Oncology since 2022. We report on the most important parameters of the colorectal robot-assisted surgery of the first 191 patients. Robotically assisted rectal surgery was compared with our previous laparoscopic and open surgical activities. Perioperative indicators of rectal cancer patients operated laparoscopically (n=225) and open (n=213) were retrospectively compared with patients operated robotically assisted (n=140). In comparison of the three groups (laparoscopic, open, robot-assisted), robotic surgery shows a significant advantage in quality of mesorectal excision (complete TME rate 77%, 72.7% and 90%, respectively), in the days of care (median 7, 9 and 5 days, respectively), hospital readmissions (8%, 16%, 6.4%), and the rate of sphincter preservation (68%, 60% and 89.5%). As a conclusion, robotic surgery is sufficiently safe from oncological point of view. It has a significant advantage in quality of lymph node dissection, shorter care, fewer hospital readmissions, partially lower morbidity rate and a higher sphincter preservation rate compared to laparoscopic and open surgeries.

PubMedVol. 68(3)
Országos Idegsebészeti Tudományos Intézet (HU), Országos Pszichiátriai és Neurológiai Intézet (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.