Model-based evaluation of ammonia energy storage concepts at high technological readiness level

Ammonia is a promising carbon-free energy carrier since it can be stored as a liquid at mild conditions and its production process from hydrogen and nitrogen is established and efficient. Several Ammonia-to-Power concepts have been proposed in the literature, many of which employ not-yet-mature electrochemical technologies. We model the charging and discharging phases of three ammonia energy storage concepts in Aspen Plus seeking a compromise between efficient concepts and mature technologies. In the charging phase, ammonia is produced via the Haber–Bosch process using hydrogen from low-temperature water electrolysis for all the considered concepts. For the discharging phase, three ammonia conversion processes are modeled: (i) ammonia is thermally decomposed into nitrogen and hydrogen by using thermal energy from storage, and hydrogen is converted into electricity in a fuel cell; (ii) ammonia is thermally decomposed by using heat generated through the combustion of a fraction of the ammonia stream, and the produced hydrogen is supplied to a fuel cell; (iii) ammonia is used as a fuel in a combined power cycle. We compare these concepts with respect to roundtrip efficiency and levelized cost of electricity. The roundtrip efficiency and the levelized cost of electricity of the modeled concepts are ca. 30–34 % and 0.28–0.31 €kWh − 1 (for an electricity purchase price of 0.03 €kWh − 1 ). Concept (i) has both the highest roundtrip efficiency and the lowest levelized cost of electricity. We identify the process bottlenecks via an exergy analysis. • Modeled three ammonia energy storage concepts in Aspen Plus. • Compared the roundtrip efficiency and electricity storage cost. • Identified bottlenecks via exergy analysis. • Concept with thermal energy storage is most efficient. • Concept with thermal energy storage has lowest levelized cost of electricity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124495
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model-based evaluation of ammonia energy storage concepts at high technological readiness level

Alexander Mitsos, Simone Mucci, Michael J. Rix, Marc‐Daniel Stumm
17 citations
Applied Energy
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
1.82
article

Model-based evaluation of ammonia energy storage concepts at high technological readiness level

Alexander Mitsos, Simone Mucci, Michael J. Rix, Marc‐Daniel Stumm
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Ammonia is a promising carbon-free energy carrier since it can be stored as a liquid at mild conditions and its production process from hydrogen and nitrogen is established and efficient. Several Ammonia-to-Power concepts have been proposed in the literature, many of which employ not-yet-mature electrochemical technologies. We model the charging and discharging phases of three ammonia energy storage concepts in Aspen Plus seeking a compromise between efficient concepts and mature technologies. In the charging phase, ammonia is produced via the Haber–Bosch process using hydrogen from low-temperature water electrolysis for all the considered concepts. For the discharging phase, three ammonia conversion processes are modeled: (i) ammonia is thermally decomposed into nitrogen and hydrogen by using thermal energy from storage, and hydrogen is converted into electricity in a fuel cell; (ii) ammonia is thermally decomposed by using heat generated through the combustion of a fraction of the ammonia stream, and the produced hydrogen is supplied to a fuel cell; (iii) ammonia is used as a fuel in a combined power cycle. We compare these concepts with respect to roundtrip efficiency and levelized cost of electricity. The roundtrip efficiency and the levelized cost of electricity of the modeled concepts are ca. 30–34 % and 0.28–0.31 €kWh − 1 (for an electricity purchase price of 0.03 €kWh − 1 ). Concept (i) has both the highest roundtrip efficiency and the lowest levelized cost of electricity. We identify the process bottlenecks via an exergy analysis. • Modeled three ammonia energy storage concepts in Aspen Plus. • Compared the roundtrip efficiency and electricity storage cost. • Identified bottlenecks via exergy analysis. • Concept with thermal energy storage is most efficient. • Concept with thermal energy storage has lowest levelized cost of electricity.

Applied EnergyVol. 377
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE), KU Leuven (BE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.