Underground hydrogen storage resource assessment for the Cook Inlet, Alaska

Underground hydrogen storage will be essential to a hydrogen economy. This work focuses on the challenge of identifying and screening candidate storage systems, given the unique behavior of hydrogen in the subsurface. Here, we describe a resource assessment methodology and apply it to Alaska’s Cook Inlet region. Alaska provides an interesting case study because of its abundant renewable energy resources, relatively low energy demand, and isolated electrical grid. The assessment framework considers each site’s ability to (1) store a specific volume, (2) physically-contain the stored gas, and (3) limit biogeochemical activity. We estimate that reservoirs in the Cook Inlet area could theoretically store a total of 286 TWh (or 8.6 million tonnes [Mt]) in hydrogen working gas in 92 pools. This is likely sufficient to meet both local hydrogen demand and support an array of exportable products. We further identify seven pools that may be especially well-suited for hydrogen storage. Broadly, this work demonstrates a framework for regional resource assessments. On a finer scale, this work supports an early demonstration of porous–media hydrogen storage in the United States. • Underground hydrogen storage will be critical to clean hydrogen deployment. • This work presents a reproducible framework for storage resource assessment. • 286 TWh of hydrogen-based energy could be stored in Cook Inlet reservoirs. • Seven pools are identified as especially favorable for hydrogen storage. • This storage could meet both local demand and support hydrogen exports.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124135
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Underground hydrogen storage resource assessment for the Cook Inlet, Alaska

Nicolas Huerta, Franciszek Hasiuk, Simon Harrison, Joshua A. White et al.
4 citations
Applied Energy
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
1.00
article

Underground hydrogen storage resource assessment for the Cook Inlet, Alaska

Nicolas Huerta, Franciszek Hasiuk, Simon Harrison, Joshua A. White, Leon Hibbard, David G. Clarke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage will be essential to a hydrogen economy. This work focuses on the challenge of identifying and screening candidate storage systems, given the unique behavior of hydrogen in the subsurface. Here, we describe a resource assessment methodology and apply it to Alaska’s Cook Inlet region. Alaska provides an interesting case study because of its abundant renewable energy resources, relatively low energy demand, and isolated electrical grid. The assessment framework considers each site’s ability to (1) store a specific volume, (2) physically-contain the stored gas, and (3) limit biogeochemical activity. We estimate that reservoirs in the Cook Inlet area could theoretically store a total of 286 TWh (or 8.6 million tonnes [Mt]) in hydrogen working gas in 92 pools. This is likely sufficient to meet both local hydrogen demand and support an array of exportable products. We further identify seven pools that may be especially well-suited for hydrogen storage. Broadly, this work demonstrates a framework for regional resource assessments. On a finer scale, this work supports an early demonstration of porous–media hydrogen storage in the United States. • Underground hydrogen storage will be critical to clean hydrogen deployment. • This work presents a reproducible framework for storage resource assessment. • 286 TWh of hydrogen-based energy could be stored in Cook Inlet reservoirs. • Seven pools are identified as especially favorable for hydrogen storage. • This storage could meet both local demand and support hydrogen exports.

Applied EnergyVol. 377
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Sandia National Laboratories (US), National Energy Technology Laboratory (US), GeoMechanics Technologies (United States) (US), College of Marin (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.