Investment protection standards: Can EU law fill the shoes of investment treaties<scp>?</scp>

Abstract The termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties (‘BITs’) concluded between Member States of the European Union (‘EU’) raises the question of whether investments by an investor from an EU Member State in another Member State (‘intra-EU’ investments) are sufficiently protected under EU law. By comparing investment protection standards of intra-EU investments under EU law with the standards usually found in investment treaties, this article offers an analysis of whether the termination of intra-EU BITs creates a legal vacuum for investment protection within the EU. It then goes on to analyse whether the freedom of establishment—an EU law concept with no equivalent in investment treaties—and the proportionality principle can plug some of the gaps in investment protection identified in our comparative analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arbitration International
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investment protection standards: Can EU law fill the shoes of investment treaties?

Markus Burgstaller, Auriane Negret
1 citations
Arbitration International
International Arbitration and Investment Law
0.55
article

Investment protection standards: Can EU law fill the shoes of investment treaties?

Markus Burgstaller, Auriane Negret
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The termination of Bilateral Investment Treaties (‘BITs’) concluded between Member States of the European Union (‘EU’) raises the question of whether investments by an investor from an EU Member State in another Member State (‘intra-EU’ investments) are sufficiently protected under EU law. By comparing investment protection standards of intra-EU investments under EU law with the standards usually found in investment treaties, this article offers an analysis of whether the termination of intra-EU BITs creates a legal vacuum for investment protection within the EU. It then goes on to analyse whether the freedom of establishment—an EU law concept with no equivalent in investment treaties—and the proportionality principle can plug some of the gaps in investment protection identified in our comparative analysis.

Arbitration InternationalVol. 41(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.