Bayes in the Age of Intelligent Machines

The success of methods based on artificial neural networks in creating intelligent machines seems like it might pose a challenge to explanations of human cognition in terms of Bayesian inference. We argue that this is not the case and that these systems in fact offer new opportunities for Bayesian modeling. Specifically, we argue that artificial neural networks and Bayesian models of cognition lie at different levels of analysis and are complementary modeling approaches, together offering a way to understand human cognition that spans these levels. We also argue that the same perspective can be applied to intelligent machines, in which a Bayesian approach may be uniquely valuable in understanding the behavior of large, opaque artificial neural networks that are trained on proprietary data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214241262329
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayes in the Age of Intelligent Machines

R. Thomas McCoy, Erin Grant, Jian-Qiao Zhu, Thomas L. Griffiths
3 citations
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
1.04
article

Bayes in the Age of Intelligent Machines

R. Thomas McCoy, Erin Grant, Jian-Qiao Zhu, Thomas L. Griffiths
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The success of methods based on artificial neural networks in creating intelligent machines seems like it might pose a challenge to explanations of human cognition in terms of Bayesian inference. We argue that this is not the case and that these systems in fact offer new opportunities for Bayesian modeling. Specifically, we argue that artificial neural networks and Bayesian models of cognition lie at different levels of analysis and are complementary modeling approaches, together offering a way to understand human cognition that spans these levels. We also argue that the same perspective can be applied to intelligent machines, in which a Bayesian approach may be uniquely valuable in understanding the behavior of large, opaque artificial neural networks that are trained on proprietary data.

Current Directions in Psychological ScienceVol. 33(5)
Princeton University (US), Yale University (US), Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience (GB), University College London (GB)
National Science Foundation, NOMIS Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.