Analisis Putusan KPPU yang Melampaui Kewenangan Berdasarkan UU Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha

This study highlights the importance of consistency in the application of KPPU's authority in accordance with the Anti-Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition Law. There is a research gap regarding the alignment of KPPU's sanctioning authority, particularly in Decision Number 17/KPPU-I/2018. The study aims to analyze the sanctioning authority of KPPU and its compliance with Law Number 5 of 1999. A normative juridical method is used to examine the decision and relevant laws, focusing on the limits of KPPU's authority. The key findings indicate that KPPU's Decision Number 17/KPPU-I/2018 exceeds the authority stipulated by the law, especially in imposing administrative measures on business actors violating Article 22. The implication is that KPPU must adhere to its authorized limits to ensure the effectiveness of competition law enforcement in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL SUPREMASI
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.3805
Primary Topic
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Putusan KPPU yang Melampaui Kewenangan Berdasarkan UU Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha

Rian Benedictus Rumagit
JURNAL SUPREMASI
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
article

Analisis Putusan KPPU yang Melampaui Kewenangan Berdasarkan UU Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha

Rian Benedictus Rumagit
article en

Abstract

This study highlights the importance of consistency in the application of KPPU's authority in accordance with the Anti-Monopoly and Unfair Business Competition Law. There is a research gap regarding the alignment of KPPU's sanctioning authority, particularly in Decision Number 17/KPPU-I/2018. The study aims to analyze the sanctioning authority of KPPU and its compliance with Law Number 5 of 1999. A normative juridical method is used to examine the decision and relevant laws, focusing on the limits of KPPU's authority. The key findings indicate that KPPU's Decision Number 17/KPPU-I/2018 exceeds the authority stipulated by the law, especially in imposing administrative measures on business actors violating Article 22. The implication is that KPPU must adhere to its authorized limits to ensure the effectiveness of competition law enforcement in Indonesia.

JURNAL SUPREMASI
University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analisis Putusan KPPU yang Melampaui Kewenangan Berdasarkan UU Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha — Rian Benedictus Rumagit · JURNAL SUPREMASI (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS