Embeddings Between State and Action Based Probabilistic Logics

This article defines embeddings between state-based and action-based probabilistic logics which can be used to support probabilistic model checking. First, we slightly modify the model embeddings proposed in the literature to allow invisible computation steps and the preservation of forward and backward bisimulation relations. Next, we propose the syntax and semantics of an action-based Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic (APCTL) and an action-based PCTL* (APCTL*) interpreted over action-labeled discrete-time Markov chains (ADTMCs). We show that both these logics are strictly more expressive than the probabilistic variant of Hennessy–Milner logic (prHML). We define an embedding aldl which can be used to construct APCTL* formulae from PCTL* formulae and an embedding sldl from APCTL* formulae to PCTL* formulae. Similarly, we define the embeddings \(aldl^{\prime }\) and \(sldl^{\prime }\) from PCTL to APCTL and APCTL to PCTL, respectively. We also define the reward-based variant of APCTL (APRCTL) interpreted over action-based Markov Reward Models (AMRM), and accordingly modify the logical embeddings \(aldl^{\prime }\) and \(sldl^{\prime }\) which allows us to take into account the notion of rewards. Additionally, we also show that the idea of rewards can be used to reason about the bounded until operator in PCTL and APCTL. Finally, we prove that our logical embeddings combined with the model embeddings enable one to minimize, analyze, and verify probabilistic models in one domain using state-of-the-art tools and techniques developed for the other domain. In order to validate the efficacy of our theoretical framework, we apply it to two case studies using the probabilistic symbolic model checker (PRISM).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formal Aspects of Computing
Published
2024-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3696431
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embeddings Between State and Action Based Probabilistic Logics

Susmoy Das, Arpit Sharma
Formal Aspects of Computing
Formal Methods in Verification
article

Embeddings Between State and Action Based Probabilistic Logics

Susmoy Das, Arpit Sharma
article en

Abstract

This article defines embeddings between state-based and action-based probabilistic logics which can be used to support probabilistic model checking. First, we slightly modify the model embeddings proposed in the literature to allow invisible computation steps and the preservation of forward and backward bisimulation relations. Next, we propose the syntax and semantics of an action-based Probabilistic Computation Tree Logic (APCTL) and an action-based PCTL* (APCTL*) interpreted over action-labeled discrete-time Markov chains (ADTMCs). We show that both these logics are strictly more expressive than the probabilistic variant of Hennessy–Milner logic (prHML). We define an embedding aldl which can be used to construct APCTL* formulae from PCTL* formulae and an embedding sldl from APCTL* formulae to PCTL* formulae. Similarly, we define the embeddings \(aldl^{\prime }\) and \(sldl^{\prime }\) from PCTL to APCTL and APCTL to PCTL, respectively. We also define the reward-based variant of APCTL (APRCTL) interpreted over action-based Markov Reward Models (AMRM), and accordingly modify the logical embeddings \(aldl^{\prime }\) and \(sldl^{\prime }\) which allows us to take into account the notion of rewards. Additionally, we also show that the idea of rewards can be used to reason about the bounded until operator in PCTL and APCTL. Finally, we prove that our logical embeddings combined with the model embeddings enable one to minimize, analyze, and verify probabilistic models in one domain using state-of-the-art tools and techniques developed for the other domain. In order to validate the efficacy of our theoretical framework, we apply it to two case studies using the probabilistic symbolic model checker (PRISM).

Formal Aspects of ComputingVol. 37(2)
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhopal (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Embeddings Between State and Action Based Probabilistic Logics — Susmoy Das, Arpit Sharma · Formal Aspects of Computing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS