Investigating the quality of source integration in an academic writing exam

Integrated writing tasks have become the standard for many English language exams. However, do they elicit the type of source use expected in academic settings? To address this question, this study reports on source integration on an operational English exam administered in Japan. Responses of 24 secondary students on two forms of the exam were analyzed and coded for stylistic conventions, language transformation (e.g. paraphrase), and rhetorical functions. While many responses lacked the sophistication and formal conventions of undergraduate- and graduate-level responses analyzed in previous studies, they revealed test takers’ emerging ability to engage with sources in a way that reflects the expectations of academic writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Language Assessment
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58379/cuuo1529
Primary Topic
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the quality of source integration in an academic writing exam

Amber Vanderwoude, Liubou Shefarevich
Studies in Language Assessment
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
article

Investigating the quality of source integration in an academic writing exam

Amber Vanderwoude, Liubou Shefarevich
article en

Abstract

Integrated writing tasks have become the standard for many English language exams. However, do they elicit the type of source use expected in academic settings? To address this question, this study reports on source integration on an operational English exam administered in Japan. Responses of 24 secondary students on two forms of the exam were analyzed and coded for stylistic conventions, language transformation (e.g. paraphrase), and rhetorical functions. While many responses lacked the sophistication and formal conventions of undergraduate- and graduate-level responses analyzed in previous studies, they revealed test takers’ emerging ability to engage with sources in a way that reflects the expectations of academic writing.

Studies in Language Assessment
Electronics Testing Center (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Wikis in Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.