Key stakeholders’ perspectives of illicit drug use and associated harms in the Northern Territory of Australia

Abstract Background In the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia, there are significant evidence gaps about illicit drug use and harms, despite having established monitoring and reporting systems. This paper reports on illicit drug use, associated harms, contributing factors, service needs and priorities in the NT from the perspective and experiences of key stakeholders engaged in providing services for, or advocating on behalf of, people who use illicit drugs in the NT. Methods Face-to-face and online qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders across urban and remote locations in the NT. Key stakeholders were service providers, including acute and primary care clinicians, representatives of Aboriginal community controlled health organisations, lived experience advocates, peak body representatives and public health executives. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results Four researchers interviewed 21 participants across urban (62%), and remote areas (38%) of the NT. Themes identified were: (1) Illicit drug use and harms are diverse and distinct; (2) Client support needs are complex and influenced by co-morbidities, socio-demographic and cultural factors; (3) Priority population sub-groups need targeted strategies; (4) Local service strengths can be further developed and enhanced; (5) Local services need better resourcing; (6) Invest in progressive legislative and policy reforms; and (7) Improve routine monitoring and evaluation. Conclusions Key stakeholders described illicit drug use, harms and contributing factors, which provided insights into the local challenges. Participants emphasised that clients have complex care needs, and further investment into targeted strategies are required to improve service engagement with priority groups. Service needs included greater understanding the role of dual diagnosis and its implementation and enhancing integrated and collaborative care in both primary health and acute care contexts. The voices of people with lived experience captured in this paper must inform local strategy and policy development relating to illicit drug use, in alignment with national strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harm Reduction Journal
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01092-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key stakeholders’ perspectives of illicit drug use and associated harms in the Northern Territory of Australia

Skye McPhie, James Andrew Buchan Smith, Noémi Keresztes, Cassandra C. J. Wright et al.
1 citations
Harm Reduction Journal
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
0.54
article

Key stakeholders’ perspectives of illicit drug use and associated harms in the Northern Territory of Australia

Skye McPhie, James Andrew Buchan Smith, Noémi Keresztes, Cassandra C. J. Wright, Samuel G. Moore, Jason Bonson, Ashlea Bartram, Bryce Brickley, Jacqueline Bowden, Alice McEntee, Craig Martin, Anthea Brand, Nataly Bovopoulos, Madeleine Bower
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background In the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia, there are significant evidence gaps about illicit drug use and harms, despite having established monitoring and reporting systems. This paper reports on illicit drug use, associated harms, contributing factors, service needs and priorities in the NT from the perspective and experiences of key stakeholders engaged in providing services for, or advocating on behalf of, people who use illicit drugs in the NT. Methods Face-to-face and online qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders across urban and remote locations in the NT. Key stakeholders were service providers, including acute and primary care clinicians, representatives of Aboriginal community controlled health organisations, lived experience advocates, peak body representatives and public health executives. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results Four researchers interviewed 21 participants across urban (62%), and remote areas (38%) of the NT. Themes identified were: (1) Illicit drug use and harms are diverse and distinct; (2) Client support needs are complex and influenced by co-morbidities, socio-demographic and cultural factors; (3) Priority population sub-groups need targeted strategies; (4) Local service strengths can be further developed and enhanced; (5) Local services need better resourcing; (6) Invest in progressive legislative and policy reforms; and (7) Improve routine monitoring and evaluation. Conclusions Key stakeholders described illicit drug use, harms and contributing factors, which provided insights into the local challenges. Participants emphasised that clients have complex care needs, and further investment into targeted strategies are required to improve service engagement with priority groups. Service needs included greater understanding the role of dual diagnosis and its implementation and enhancing integrated and collaborative care in both primary health and acute care contexts. The voices of people with lived experience captured in this paper must inform local strategy and policy development relating to illicit drug use, in alignment with national strategy.

Harm Reduction JournalVol. 21(1)
Burnet Institute (AU), Flinders University (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Alcohol and Drug Foundation (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Menzies School of Health Research (AU), Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health (AU)
Alcohol and Drug Foundation, Australian Government, Northern Territory Primary Health Network
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.