Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol

The aim of the SDM-RCC study is to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on the decision-making process and outcomes. The intervention includes online patient decision aids (PtDAs) and training of health care professionals (HCPs) in the use of PtDAs and SDM. The study is a multicenter, prospective pretest-posttest cohort in six Dutch hospitals, focusing on patients with localized or metastatic RCC. The primary outcome is the observed quality of the decision-making process, measured using OPTION-5 scores. Secondary outcomes include perceived quality of the decision-making process, decision quality, and implementation of the intervention (user statistics and interviews). Quantitative analysis will be performed on questionnaire data, while qualitative analysis will be performed on interviews using coding based on established frameworks. The study results could improve understanding of the decision-making process for RCC patients from patient, HCP, and observer perspectives. The SDM tool implemented is expected to support the decision-making process. PATIENT SUMMARY: We are conducting a trial on the effects of a tool to support shared decision-making by patients with kidney cancer who are facing treatment decisions. This paper outlines the protocol that will be used for the trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Urology Oncology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2024.09.003
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol

Harm H.E. van Melick, Mirjam M. Garvelink, F Christiaan K Dolk, P. B. van der Nat et al.
1 links
European Urology Oncology
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Evaluating the Impact of a Shared Decision-making Intervention for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SDM-RCC Study Protocol

Harm H.E. van Melick, Mirjam M. Garvelink, F Christiaan K Dolk, P. B. van der Nat, Cato C Bresser, Birgitta M M van den Berg
article en

Abstract

The aim of the SDM-RCC study is to evaluate the impact of a comprehensive shared decision-making (SDM) intervention for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on the decision-making process and outcomes. The intervention includes online patient decision aids (PtDAs) and training of health care professionals (HCPs) in the use of PtDAs and SDM. The study is a multicenter, prospective pretest-posttest cohort in six Dutch hospitals, focusing on patients with localized or metastatic RCC. The primary outcome is the observed quality of the decision-making process, measured using OPTION-5 scores. Secondary outcomes include perceived quality of the decision-making process, decision quality, and implementation of the intervention (user statistics and interviews). Quantitative analysis will be performed on questionnaire data, while qualitative analysis will be performed on interviews using coding based on established frameworks. The study results could improve understanding of the decision-making process for RCC patients from patient, HCP, and observer perspectives. The SDM tool implemented is expected to support the decision-making process. PATIENT SUMMARY: We are conducting a trial on the effects of a tool to support shared decision-making by patients with kidney cancer who are facing treatment decisions. This paper outlines the protocol that will be used for the trial.

European Urology OncologyVol. 8(2)
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL), MSD (Netherlands) (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.