Studying the influence of interest groups on non-decisionmaking: challenges and tools in research design

The political science literature has extensively analyzed the political influence of interest groups in recent years. Despite growing scholarly interest into their role in agenda-setting, a significant blind spot remains in understanding their control over non-decisionmaking. This lack of insight into interest groups’ negative agenda-setting influence is primarily due to three fundamental challenges in research design: conceptualization, sampling, and measurement. This paper addresses these hurdles and proposes potential solutions to overcome them. It subsequently demonstrates the applicability of these recommendations within the empirical setting of the European Union. Overall, this paper shows that, despite the inherent difficulties in studying interest groups’ ability to keep their ‘nightmare’ issues off the agenda, these challenges can be overcome, providing valuable insights into this crucial aspect of political behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Research Exchange
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736x.2024.2405726
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying the influence of interest groups on non-decisionmaking: challenges and tools in research design

Peter Bursens, Dirk De Biévre, Frederik Stevens
5 citations
Political Research Exchange
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
2.77
article

Studying the influence of interest groups on non-decisionmaking: challenges and tools in research design

Peter Bursens, Dirk De Biévre, Frederik Stevens
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The political science literature has extensively analyzed the political influence of interest groups in recent years. Despite growing scholarly interest into their role in agenda-setting, a significant blind spot remains in understanding their control over non-decisionmaking. This lack of insight into interest groups’ negative agenda-setting influence is primarily due to three fundamental challenges in research design: conceptualization, sampling, and measurement. This paper addresses these hurdles and proposes potential solutions to overcome them. It subsequently demonstrates the applicability of these recommendations within the empirical setting of the European Union. Overall, this paper shows that, despite the inherent difficulties in studying interest groups’ ability to keep their ‘nightmare’ issues off the agenda, these challenges can be overcome, providing valuable insights into this crucial aspect of political behavior.

Political Research ExchangeVol. 6(1)
University of Antwerp (BE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
2.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Studying the influence of interest groups on non-decisionmaking: challenges and tools in research design — Peter Bursens, Dirk De Biévre, et al. · Political Research Exchange (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS