Rainfall shocks and state repression: How rainfall shocks incentivize governments to commit human rights abuses

We posit that rainfall shocks have an indirect effect on state repression through their impact on food production. Rainfall shocks are associated with reduced food production, which can generate grievances among the populace while also creating incentives for them to mobilize against the regime. In turn, governments employ repression to insulate themselves from these adverse climatic events. We also argue that this relationship is most pronounced in developing states. Analyses are conducted using causal mediation analysis on a global sample of states from 1992 to 2015. We find support for our argument; rainfall shocks have an indirect effect on repression by first reducing food production. We also find that rainfall shocks only have a systematic impact on state repression in developing countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942241280702
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rainfall shocks and state repression: How rainfall shocks incentivize governments to commit human rights abuses

Benjamin J. Appel, Nathaniel C Smith
2 citations
Conflict Management and Peace Science
Human Rights and Development
2.26
article

Rainfall shocks and state repression: How rainfall shocks incentivize governments to commit human rights abuses

Benjamin J. Appel, Nathaniel C Smith
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We posit that rainfall shocks have an indirect effect on state repression through their impact on food production. Rainfall shocks are associated with reduced food production, which can generate grievances among the populace while also creating incentives for them to mobilize against the regime. In turn, governments employ repression to insulate themselves from these adverse climatic events. We also argue that this relationship is most pronounced in developing states. Analyses are conducted using causal mediation analysis on a global sample of states from 1992 to 2015. We find support for our argument; rainfall shocks have an indirect effect on repression by first reducing food production. We also find that rainfall shocks only have a systematic impact on state repression in developing countries.

Conflict Management and Peace ScienceVol. 42(5)
University of California San Diego (US), Nebraska Wesleyan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Human Rights and Development
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.