A comparative Study of standard dressing verses vac therapy dressing in diabetic foot ulcer patients

A severe and debilitating sign of untreated diabetes that manifests as ulcers on the foot is diabetic foot ulcer. About 20% of hospital admissions for diabetes mellitus among patients are believed to be related to it. The severity of problems including amputation and mortality can be decreased by treating ulcerations effectively and early on. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure dressings to standard dressings in terms of healing rate, granulation tissue formation, treatment duration, and patient satisfaction. Thirty patients participated in the six-month trial, which was conducted at A.C.S. Medical College and Hospital. They were divided into equal-sized groups. Patients in groups 1 and 2 (n = 15 each) got vacuum-assisted closure dressings and standard dressings, respectively. By comparing size and grade of the ulcer before and after treatment show signs of healing and the formation of granulation tissues. After treatment, the size and grade of ulcers varied significantly, with vacuum- assisted closure dressing having high amount of variation (mean size: 2.47, grade of ulcer :0.13, P value: 0.001) compared to standard dressing (mean size:4.13 grade of ulcer:1.13). Within a month or two, 93.3% of patients completed their treatment, and no longer were dissatisfied with vacuum- assisted closure dressing. As a result, the study concluded that vacuum- assisted closure dressing is more beneficial and effective than standard dressing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.19.3.0620
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative Study of standard dressing verses vac therapy dressing in diabetic foot ulcer patients

S Bakyalakshmi, M Swarnalatha, G. Vaishnavi, Kunkuma Vaishnavi S et al.
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

A comparative Study of standard dressing verses vac therapy dressing in diabetic foot ulcer patients

S Bakyalakshmi, M Swarnalatha, G. Vaishnavi, Kunkuma Vaishnavi S, Sakthi Abirami R
article en

Abstract

A severe and debilitating sign of untreated diabetes that manifests as ulcers on the foot is diabetic foot ulcer. About 20% of hospital admissions for diabetes mellitus among patients are believed to be related to it. The severity of problems including amputation and mortality can be decreased by treating ulcerations effectively and early on. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of vacuum-assisted closure dressings to standard dressings in terms of healing rate, granulation tissue formation, treatment duration, and patient satisfaction. Thirty patients participated in the six-month trial, which was conducted at A.C.S. Medical College and Hospital. They were divided into equal-sized groups. Patients in groups 1 and 2 (n = 15 each) got vacuum-assisted closure dressings and standard dressings, respectively. By comparing size and grade of the ulcer before and after treatment show signs of healing and the formation of granulation tissues. After treatment, the size and grade of ulcers varied significantly, with vacuum- assisted closure dressing having high amount of variation (mean size: 2.47, grade of ulcer :0.13, P value: 0.001) compared to standard dressing (mean size:4.13 grade of ulcer:1.13). Within a month or two, 93.3% of patients completed their treatment, and no longer were dissatisfied with vacuum- assisted closure dressing. As a result, the study concluded that vacuum- assisted closure dressing is more beneficial and effective than standard dressing.

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health SciencesVol. 19(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.