Tracking the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals: Applying Three Approaches in South Asia

This study assesses sustainable development in South Asian economies based on their development stages, using three distinct approaches: the traditional "GDP approach," focusing on economic indicators; the "Beyond-GDP approach," incorporating social and natural resource indicators; and the "SDG-based approach," emphasizing quality-of-life metrics aligned with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A composite indicator method was employed, selecting nineteen indicator groups for analysis. Key findings show that factors like the Corruption Index, foreign direct investments, government debt, energy imports, and vulnerable employment have the most significant impact on sustainable development. Bhutan and the Maldives rank highest across all approaches, while Pakistan and India rank lowest, with Pakistan scoring the lowest in both the GDP and SDG-based approaches. The study recommends using the SDG-based ranking to prioritize development efforts and funding allocation, with specific suggestions for enhancing sustainability in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Economics Review
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2024(ix-iii).03
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals: Applying Three Approaches in South Asia

Salma Sadiq, Muhammad Yar Khan, Majid Jamal Khan
Global Economics Review
International Development and Aid
article

Tracking the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals: Applying Three Approaches in South Asia

Salma Sadiq, Muhammad Yar Khan, Majid Jamal Khan
article en

Abstract

This study assesses sustainable development in South Asian economies based on their development stages, using three distinct approaches: the traditional "GDP approach," focusing on economic indicators; the "Beyond-GDP approach," incorporating social and natural resource indicators; and the "SDG-based approach," emphasizing quality-of-life metrics aligned with the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A composite indicator method was employed, selecting nineteen indicator groups for analysis. Key findings show that factors like the Corruption Index, foreign direct investments, government debt, energy imports, and vulnerable employment have the most significant impact on sustainable development. Bhutan and the Maldives rank highest across all approaches, while Pakistan and India rank lowest, with Pakistan scoring the lowest in both the GDP and SDG-based approaches. The study recommends using the SDG-based ranking to prioritize development efforts and funding allocation, with specific suggestions for enhancing sustainability in the region.

Global Economics ReviewVol. IX(III)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), University of Wah (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tracking the Progress of Sustainable Development Goals: Applying Three Approaches in South Asia — Salma Sadiq, Muhammad Yar Khan, et al. · Global Economics Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS