The role of economics and the quality of antitrust case assessment in China: an empirical investigation

This article empirically measures indicators capturing the role of economics in the antitrust decisions of the Competition Authorities of China from 2010 – 2021. The methodology allows that identification of the legal standards (LSs) adopted in assessing different conduct types and their evolution. The LSs are compared to their theoretically optimal level in order to deduce quality of enforcement. Comparative analysis is undertaken with published results on the role of economics for EC’s DGCOMP, UK’s CMA and Russia’s FAS. The Chinese Authorities’ enforcement record lags behind in quality that of DGCOMP and CMA in abuse of dominance cases though it is already well ahead of countries in which their modern Competition Law enforcement started at about the same time (2008), like Russia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BRICS Journal of Economics
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/brics-econ.5.e126421
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of economics and the quality of antitrust case assessment in China: an empirical investigation

Yannis Katsoulacos, Lingbing Feng, Zili Wang, Zinxhue Gao
BRICS Journal of Economics
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

The role of economics and the quality of antitrust case assessment in China: an empirical investigation

Yannis Katsoulacos, Lingbing Feng, Zili Wang, Zinxhue Gao
article en

Abstract

This article empirically measures indicators capturing the role of economics in the antitrust decisions of the Competition Authorities of China from 2010 – 2021. The methodology allows that identification of the legal standards (LSs) adopted in assessing different conduct types and their evolution. The LSs are compared to their theoretically optimal level in order to deduce quality of enforcement. Comparative analysis is undertaken with published results on the role of economics for EC’s DGCOMP, UK’s CMA and Russia’s FAS. The Chinese Authorities’ enforcement record lags behind in quality that of DGCOMP and CMA in abuse of dominance cases though it is already well ahead of countries in which their modern Competition Law enforcement started at about the same time (2008), like Russia.

BRICS Journal of EconomicsVol. 5(3)
Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN), Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.