Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions

Background The advent of generative-artificial intelligence (AI) applications introduces new challenges for colleges. Importantly, the growth of these applications requires faculty to adjust their pedagogy to account for the changing technological landscape. Objective As colleges wrestle with the implications of these applications, it is important to understand college students’ perceptions and use of generative-AI. Method Undergraduate college students’ (in psychology courses) were surveyed about their use and perception of these applications. The sample was from five U.S. universities; primarily made up of women, and included White, Hispanic, and Black participants. Results Most students were familiar with these applications, yet less than half had used them in college, primarily to receive help with assignments. Those not using these applications gave “getting caught” and “cheating” as responses for not using them. Finally, most students perceived using these applications as cheating. Conclusions Students were familiar with these applications and were most likely to use them in humanities courses. Furthermore, these applications were used most often in writing tasks. Teaching Implications The increased use of these applications has led to educators debating whether these applications should be incorporated into the college classroom. Do these applications have pedological value or are they just another means for cheating?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching of Psychology
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241280350
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions

Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Kelly C. Burke, Ilyssa Salomon, Anne M. Lippert et al.
18 citations
Teaching of Psychology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.47
article

Generative AI and College Students: Use and Perceptions

Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Kelly C. Burke, Ilyssa Salomon, Anne M. Lippert, Jonathan M. Golding
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Background The advent of generative-artificial intelligence (AI) applications introduces new challenges for colleges. Importantly, the growth of these applications requires faculty to adjust their pedagogy to account for the changing technological landscape. Objective As colleges wrestle with the implications of these applications, it is important to understand college students’ perceptions and use of generative-AI. Method Undergraduate college students’ (in psychology courses) were surveyed about their use and perception of these applications. The sample was from five U.S. universities; primarily made up of women, and included White, Hispanic, and Black participants. Results Most students were familiar with these applications, yet less than half had used them in college, primarily to receive help with assignments. Those not using these applications gave “getting caught” and “cheating” as responses for not using them. Finally, most students perceived using these applications as cheating. Conclusions Students were familiar with these applications and were most likely to use them in humanities courses. Furthermore, these applications were used most often in writing tasks. Teaching Implications The increased use of these applications has led to educators debating whether these applications should be incorporated into the college classroom. Do these applications have pedological value or are they just another means for cheating?

Teaching of PsychologyVol. 52(3)
University of Kentucky (US), The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Elon University (US), Prairie View A&M University (US), University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.