Is the Technology Acceptance Model just old wine in new wineskins? Exploring issues for further model development

For about three decades, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been a crucial source of information for understanding the factors and processes that influence the integration of technology. The TAM has been extensively studied in various educational settings, involving students and teachers across different academic levels and specific technologies. The diverse range of applications has generated a vast body of evidence affirming the model’s relevance in education. However, despite its success, the research on the TAM still has some unresolved issues and limitations. In this commentary, I address these existing concerns and describe further areas for improvement, including the model itself, the measurement of TAM constructs, and existing gaps and conflicting findings in the current body of evidence. By shedding light on these issues, I hope to guide future research endeavors that build upon and refine the TAM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53761/var55x96
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wine Industry and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Technology Acceptance Model just old wine in new wineskins? Exploring issues for further model development

Ronny Scherer
4 citations
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Wine Industry and Tourism
3.72
article

Is the Technology Acceptance Model just old wine in new wineskins? Exploring issues for further model development

Ronny Scherer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

For about three decades, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been a crucial source of information for understanding the factors and processes that influence the integration of technology. The TAM has been extensively studied in various educational settings, involving students and teachers across different academic levels and specific technologies. The diverse range of applications has generated a vast body of evidence affirming the model’s relevance in education. However, despite its success, the research on the TAM still has some unresolved issues and limitations. In this commentary, I address these existing concerns and describe further areas for improvement, including the model itself, the measurement of TAM constructs, and existing gaps and conflicting findings in the current body of evidence. By shedding light on these issues, I hope to guide future research endeavors that build upon and refine the TAM.

Journal of University Teaching and Learning PracticeVol. 21(08)
University of Oslo (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wine Industry and Tourism
3.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.