The London Convention: Jurisdiction and Liability Issues

Abstract For most of human history, dumping of waste was out of sight and out of mind. The London Convention and its 1996 Protocol forms part of a wider network of instruments under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea that seek to protect and preserve the marine environment. This regime has come under pressure from new activities, as well as from developments in other areas of law. This paper provides some reflections on the key challenges facing the London Convention regime in terms of its jurisdictional reach and liability mechanisms. Whilst the regime responded to new forms of dumping, questions remain about how it can be used to respond to situations like the Fukushima incident and whether monitoring and reporting of dumping is effective. Perhaps more challenging is the lack of progress in developing an effective liability regime comparable to other harmful activities like oil pollution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10181
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The London Convention: Jurisdiction and Liability Issues

Richard Barnes
1 links
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
International Maritime Law Issues
article

The London Convention: Jurisdiction and Liability Issues

Richard Barnes
article en

Abstract

Abstract For most of human history, dumping of waste was out of sight and out of mind. The London Convention and its 1996 Protocol forms part of a wider network of instruments under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea that seek to protect and preserve the marine environment. This regime has come under pressure from new activities, as well as from developments in other areas of law. This paper provides some reflections on the key challenges facing the London Convention regime in terms of its jurisdictional reach and liability mechanisms. Whilst the regime responded to new forms of dumping, questions remain about how it can be used to respond to situations like the Fukushima incident and whether monitoring and reporting of dumping is effective. Perhaps more challenging is the lack of progress in developing an effective liability regime comparable to other harmful activities like oil pollution.

The International Journal of Marine and Coastal LawVol. 39(3)
University of Lincoln (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.