Corporate governance, firm risk and firm performance: the moderating role of group affiliation

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the moderating effect of group affiliation (GA) while examining the relationship of corporate governance (CG) with firm performance (FP) and firm risk-taking (FRT). Design/methodology/approach The study employed a sample of 100 non-financial firms, selected randomly from the top 500 companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) based on their market capitalisation for 2013–2022. The random effects and fixed effect models are employed for the analysis. Furthermore, the generalised estimating equations (GEE) population-averaged model is used for added robustness. Findings The results reveal that while strong CG improves FP, GA modifies the effect of CG on FP. Both GA and CG have beneficial effects, but their synergy is insignificant. However, in the context of CG and FRT, the study unveils that a strong CG is associated with a reduction in FRT, and this relationship is more pronounced for standalone firms. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, the present study is a maiden attempt to investigate the moderating effect of GA while examining the relationship of CG with FP and FRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Review of Accounting
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-04-2024-0106
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate governance, firm risk and firm performance: the moderating role of group affiliation

Niva Kalita, Ratish Kumar Jha, Reshma Kumari Tiwari
5 citations
Asian Review of Accounting
Corporate Finance and Governance
4.73
article

Corporate governance, firm risk and firm performance: the moderating role of group affiliation

Niva Kalita, Ratish Kumar Jha, Reshma Kumari Tiwari
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine the moderating effect of group affiliation (GA) while examining the relationship of corporate governance (CG) with firm performance (FP) and firm risk-taking (FRT). Design/methodology/approach The study employed a sample of 100 non-financial firms, selected randomly from the top 500 companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) based on their market capitalisation for 2013–2022. The random effects and fixed effect models are employed for the analysis. Furthermore, the generalised estimating equations (GEE) population-averaged model is used for added robustness. Findings The results reveal that while strong CG improves FP, GA modifies the effect of CG on FP. Both GA and CG have beneficial effects, but their synergy is insignificant. However, in the context of CG and FRT, the study unveils that a strong CG is associated with a reduction in FRT, and this relationship is more pronounced for standalone firms. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge, the present study is a maiden attempt to investigate the moderating effect of GA while examining the relationship of CG with FP and FRT.

Asian Review of AccountingVol. 33(2)
Tezpur University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corporate Finance and Governance
4.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate governance, firm risk and firm performance: the moderating role of group affiliation — Niva Kalita, Ratish Kumar Jha, et al. · Asian Review of Accounting (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS