The stadial model of alignment formation (SMAF): Conceptualising strategic alignments between states

Abstract Despite being ubiquitously used, the concept of alignment remains inchoate. Existing literature offers more than 30 interpretations of the term and very few attempts to develop an objective indicators-based metric of alignment. This state of the field makes assessments of the degree to which states are aligned problematic. This article systematises the theoretical knowledge about alliances, alignments, strategic partnerships, and other forms of cooperation and draws on some empirical observations to develop a ‘stadial model of alignment formation’ (SMAF). The model conceptualises, operationalises, measures, and explains interstate alignment with greater precision and consistency. It also includes the explanatory factors in the form of the three balances – the balance of power, the balance of threat, and the balance of interest – and connections between them located along the stages of alignment formation. As such, the SMAF framework gauges the relative scale and depth of strategic alignments and can facilitate comparative analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Security
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2024.25
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The stadial model of alignment formation (SMAF): Conceptualising strategic alignments between states

Alexander Korolev
5 citations
European Journal of International Security
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
5.66
article

The stadial model of alignment formation (SMAF): Conceptualising strategic alignments between states

Alexander Korolev
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite being ubiquitously used, the concept of alignment remains inchoate. Existing literature offers more than 30 interpretations of the term and very few attempts to develop an objective indicators-based metric of alignment. This state of the field makes assessments of the degree to which states are aligned problematic. This article systematises the theoretical knowledge about alliances, alignments, strategic partnerships, and other forms of cooperation and draws on some empirical observations to develop a ‘stadial model of alignment formation’ (SMAF). The model conceptualises, operationalises, measures, and explains interstate alignment with greater precision and consistency. It also includes the explanatory factors in the form of the three balances – the balance of power, the balance of threat, and the balance of interest – and connections between them located along the stages of alignment formation. As such, the SMAF framework gauges the relative scale and depth of strategic alignments and can facilitate comparative analysis.

European Journal of International SecurityVol. 9(4)
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
5.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The stadial model of alignment formation (SMAF): Conceptualising strategic alignments between states — Alexander Korolev · European Journal of International Security (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS