Constraints and lexical conditioning in the dative alternation

Abstract This article presents a cross-linguistic variationist study of the dative alternations in English ( I gave Tom a present vs. I gave a present to Tom ) and Dutch ( Ik gaf Tom een cadeau vs. Ik gaf een cadeau aan Tom ). We use logistic mixed-effects regression and lasso regression to assess the probabilistic conditioning of dative choices as a function of morphosyntactic, semantico-pragmatic and lexical constraints in both languages. In addition, we test the predictive accuracy of our two language-specific models cross-linguistically. The results show a substantial overlap in the probabilistic constraints, but also a larger reliance on lexical content in Dutch compared to English, which suggests differences in complexity across the English and Dutch dative alternations. The methodology adopted in this study may pave a new way for comparative variational linguistics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Languages in Contrast
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00052.eng
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constraints and lexical conditioning in the dative alternation

Laura Rosseel, Freek Van de Velde, Alexandra Engel, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi et al.
1 citations
Languages in Contrast
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
2.78
article

Constraints and lexical conditioning in the dative alternation

Laura Rosseel, Freek Van de Velde, Alexandra Engel, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, Elsy Andries
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article presents a cross-linguistic variationist study of the dative alternations in English ( I gave Tom a present vs. I gave a present to Tom ) and Dutch ( Ik gaf Tom een cadeau vs. Ik gaf een cadeau aan Tom ). We use logistic mixed-effects regression and lasso regression to assess the probabilistic conditioning of dative choices as a function of morphosyntactic, semantico-pragmatic and lexical constraints in both languages. In addition, we test the predictive accuracy of our two language-specific models cross-linguistically. The results show a substantial overlap in the probabilistic constraints, but also a larger reliance on lexical content in Dutch compared to English, which suggests differences in complexity across the English and Dutch dative alternations. The methodology adopted in this study may pave a new way for comparative variational linguistics.

Languages in ContrastVol. 25(2)
University of Pisa (IT), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.