E-government maturity models in the metaverse government: a conceptual framework and future research agenda

Purpose The study aims to understand the way metaverse might revolutionize the governance format – precisely the e-government concept – besides underlining the challenges leaving suggestive contours for further research in this realm. Design/methodology/approach An inductive research approach included the content analysis of relevant literature to identify patterns and generalize them into areas and approaches. Developing a conceptual framework seeks to systematically organize knowledge on metaverse government and provide an understanding of its contributions to enhancing the e-government maturity models. Findings The authors identified three general areas and approaches – content and data lifecycle management; platforms, tools and services; and infrastructure and computing resources – that shape how challenges of enterprise architecture layers should be resolved in a future research agenda. Integration of these government metaverse areas and approaches is linked with four enterprise architecture layers (technology, applications, data and business) that advance a new e-government meta stage of e-government maturity and the related challenges. Originality/value Hitherto, metaverse literature has hinged itself on the benefits and challenges of metaverse in the private sector. However, the exact dimensions have not been probed in the public sector and its e-government domain – the present study seeks to plug this gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-11-2022-0196
Citations
2
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E-government maturity models in the metaverse government: a conceptual framework and future research agenda

Charalampos Alexopoulos, Martin Lněnička, Nina Rizun, Stuti Saxena
2 citations
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
E-Government and Public Services
4.46
article

E-government maturity models in the metaverse government: a conceptual framework and future research agenda

Charalampos Alexopoulos, Martin Lněnička, Nina Rizun, Stuti Saxena
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to understand the way metaverse might revolutionize the governance format – precisely the e-government concept – besides underlining the challenges leaving suggestive contours for further research in this realm. Design/methodology/approach An inductive research approach included the content analysis of relevant literature to identify patterns and generalize them into areas and approaches. Developing a conceptual framework seeks to systematically organize knowledge on metaverse government and provide an understanding of its contributions to enhancing the e-government maturity models. Findings The authors identified three general areas and approaches – content and data lifecycle management; platforms, tools and services; and infrastructure and computing resources – that shape how challenges of enterprise architecture layers should be resolved in a future research agenda. Integration of these government metaverse areas and approaches is linked with four enterprise architecture layers (technology, applications, data and business) that advance a new e-government meta stage of e-government maturity and the related challenges. Originality/value Hitherto, metaverse literature has hinged itself on the benefits and challenges of metaverse in the private sector. However, the exact dimensions have not been probed in the public sector and its e-government domain – the present study seeks to plug this gap.

Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management
University of Pardubice (CZ), University of Gdańsk (PL), Graphic Era University (IN), University of Hradec Králové (CZ), University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
E-Government and Public Services
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.