The interactive effect of applying the management-centered standards of Joint Commission International (JCI) and practicing administrative control in improving the quality of health services: a study on three Yemeni hospitals seeking accreditation

Background: The objective of this study is to explore the interactive effect of Joint Commission International (JCI) standards and administrative control on the quality of health services. Healthcare accreditation standards and management control practices are important factors for improving quality of care. However, little is known about their interactive effects. Several theories provide useful lenses for understanding how accreditation standards and management practices alone and in combination may shape health services quality outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals seeking JCI accreditation in Yemen. One sample (n=243) completed a validated questionnaire measuring the application of JCI standards, administrative control practices, and quality outcomes. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationships between variables. Results: JCI standard implementation (mean score =6.12) and administrative control (mean score =5.98) were both rated highly by respondents. The quality of services was also very high (mean score =6.17). Regression analyses revealed significant positive effects of JCI standards (β=0.639; P<0.001) and administrative control (β=0.565; P<0.001) on quality. An interaction effect between the factors was detected (β=0.075; P=0.04), suggesting that their combined application strengthens quality outcomes. Hospital characteristics did not moderate these relationships. Conclusions: Adherence to JCI accreditation standards and strong administrative control interact positively to improve healthcare quality. Integrating these management approaches may enhance service delivery. This study contributes novel insights into the multidimensional nature of quality improvement strategies in healthcare organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-24-47
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The interactive effect of applying the management-centered standards of Joint Commission International (JCI) and practicing administrative control in improving the quality of health services: a study on three Yemeni hospitals seeking accreditation

Murad Mohammed Al‐Nashmi, Ammar Ali Alraimi
Journal of Hospital Management and Health Policy
Healthcare Quality and Management
article

The interactive effect of applying the management-centered standards of Joint Commission International (JCI) and practicing administrative control in improving the quality of health services: a study on three Yemeni hospitals seeking accreditation

Murad Mohammed Al‐Nashmi, Ammar Ali Alraimi
article en

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to explore the interactive effect of Joint Commission International (JCI) standards and administrative control on the quality of health services. Healthcare accreditation standards and management control practices are important factors for improving quality of care. However, little is known about their interactive effects. Several theories provide useful lenses for understanding how accreditation standards and management practices alone and in combination may shape health services quality outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals seeking JCI accreditation in Yemen. One sample (n=243) completed a validated questionnaire measuring the application of JCI standards, administrative control practices, and quality outcomes. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the relationships between variables. Results: JCI standard implementation (mean score =6.12) and administrative control (mean score =5.98) were both rated highly by respondents. The quality of services was also very high (mean score =6.17). Regression analyses revealed significant positive effects of JCI standards (β=0.639; P<0.001) and administrative control (β=0.565; P<0.001) on quality. An interaction effect between the factors was detected (β=0.075; P=0.04), suggesting that their combined application strengthens quality outcomes. Hospital characteristics did not moderate these relationships. Conclusions: Adherence to JCI accreditation standards and strong administrative control interact positively to improve healthcare quality. Integrating these management approaches may enhance service delivery. This study contributes novel insights into the multidimensional nature of quality improvement strategies in healthcare organizations.

Journal of Hospital Management and Health PolicyVol. 8
Sana'a University (YE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Healthcare Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.