Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Classifier Models for Predicting Student Cognitive Load and Performance Outcomes in Moodle Learning Environment
Background: Advancements in ICT have driven the widespread adoption of e-learning platforms like Moodle, enhancing education delivery and experience. While research has primarily focused on predicting learner performance using Moodle data, the role of cognitive load has been underexplored. Purpose: This study aimed to compare machine learning classifiers in predicting student cognitive load and performance within Moodle. Methodology: Conducted at the Technical University of Mombasa in Kenya between November and December 2023, the experiment involved 415 undergraduate students in a four-week online course powered by Moodle LMS. Participants were randomly assigned to a treatment group containing cognitive load management interventions or a control group, without interventions. Using Moodle logs, the predictive performance of Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forests (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) was analyzed with Python's Jupyter package. Findings: Results showed that NB had high precision (96.96%) and accuracy (93.04%) with minimal training time, while SVM also performed well with higher training time. RF excelled in accuracy but required more computational resources. Conclusion: The study suggests NB and SVM effectively predict cognitive load and performance. This knowledge can be utilized by LMS and instructional designers to advance data-driven student interventions in supporting student success in e-learning environments
Authors
- Robert Oboko
- Thaddeus Matundura Ogwoka
- Christopher Chepken (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6182-1230)
Institutions
- University of Nairobi (KE)
- Technical University of Mombasa (KE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- East African Journal of Information Technology
- Published
- 2024-09-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.37284/eajit.7.1.2227
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Online Learning and Analytics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.41