Tilt angle optimization for bifacial PV module: Balancing direct and reflected irradiance on white painted ground surfaces

This study investigates the performance of a 440 W bifacial solar photovoltaic (PV) module installed on the rooftop of the Technology Tower (TT) building at Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore. The influence of tilt angle on energy generation was examined by systematically adjusting the module from 0° to 90° during sunny days in February 2024. Measurements were collected at one-hour intervals between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. To enhance rear irradiation, the ground beneath the module was painted with white reflective material. Key performance parameters were recorded, and irradiation ratios were calculated for each tilt angle. Results showed a maximum daily average power generation of 316.85 W at a tilt angle of 30°. The corresponding bifacial irradiation ratio ranged from 0.20 to 0.40. Daily average power exhibited a progressive increase from 0° to 30° tilt, followed by a decline to a minimum of 148.51 W at 90°. Interestingly, the irradiation ratio displayed the opposite trend, increasing from 0.32 to 0.96 at 90°. These observations suggest that while overall irradiation reaching the module increases with tilt angle, optimal power generation is achieved at a 30° tilt due to a balance between front and rear irradiance. This study highlights the critical role of tilt angle and ground reflectance when using white paint in maximizing energy output from bifacial PV modules. Within the experimental setup, the PV module's power output remained relatively stable for tilt angles between 13° and 45°, even when considering a 5 % measurement uncertainty. Further investigations are affirmed to explore the impact of seasonal variations and weather conditions on the performance of bifacial modules in this specific geographical location. • Minimal change in power output from PV module for 13°-45° tilt, within 5 % uncertainty. • Near-vertical bifacial modules generate less power but capture more reflected light. • Daytime irradiation ratio increases with tilt angle, stressing reflected light's importance. • Balancing direct and reflected light is key to optimizing bifacial PV power generation. • Tilt angle selection is crucial to maximize energy production from bifacial PV modules.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124525
Citations
31
Primary Topic
solar cell performance optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tilt angle optimization for bifacial PV module: Balancing direct and reflected irradiance on white painted ground surfaces

Suprava Chakraborty, Achintya Basak, Aruna Kumar Behura
31 citations
Applied Energy
solar cell performance optimization
6.47
article

Tilt angle optimization for bifacial PV module: Balancing direct and reflected irradiance on white painted ground surfaces

Suprava Chakraborty, Achintya Basak, Aruna Kumar Behura
article en
31 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of a 440 W bifacial solar photovoltaic (PV) module installed on the rooftop of the Technology Tower (TT) building at Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore. The influence of tilt angle on energy generation was examined by systematically adjusting the module from 0° to 90° during sunny days in February 2024. Measurements were collected at one-hour intervals between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. To enhance rear irradiation, the ground beneath the module was painted with white reflective material. Key performance parameters were recorded, and irradiation ratios were calculated for each tilt angle. Results showed a maximum daily average power generation of 316.85 W at a tilt angle of 30°. The corresponding bifacial irradiation ratio ranged from 0.20 to 0.40. Daily average power exhibited a progressive increase from 0° to 30° tilt, followed by a decline to a minimum of 148.51 W at 90°. Interestingly, the irradiation ratio displayed the opposite trend, increasing from 0.32 to 0.96 at 90°. These observations suggest that while overall irradiation reaching the module increases with tilt angle, optimal power generation is achieved at a 30° tilt due to a balance between front and rear irradiance. This study highlights the critical role of tilt angle and ground reflectance when using white paint in maximizing energy output from bifacial PV modules. Within the experimental setup, the PV module's power output remained relatively stable for tilt angles between 13° and 45°, even when considering a 5 % measurement uncertainty. Further investigations are affirmed to explore the impact of seasonal variations and weather conditions on the performance of bifacial modules in this specific geographical location. • Minimal change in power output from PV module for 13°-45° tilt, within 5 % uncertainty. • Near-vertical bifacial modules generate less power but capture more reflected light. • Daytime irradiation ratio increases with tilt angle, stressing reflected light's importance. • Balancing direct and reflected light is key to optimizing bifacial PV power generation. • Tilt angle selection is crucial to maximize energy production from bifacial PV modules.

Applied EnergyVol. 377
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
solar cell performance optimization
6.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tilt angle optimization for bifacial PV module: Balancing direct and reflected irradiance on white painted ground surfaces — Suprava Chakraborty, Achintya Basak, et al. · Applied Energy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS