Equivalence of field theories: Crane–Yetter and the shadow

This work solves a 28-year conjecture by showing that two major invariants of smooth 4-manifolds, the shadow model (motivated by statistical mechanics [V. G. Turaev, Topology of shadows (1991)]) and the simplicial Crane–Yetter model (motivated by topological quantum field theory [L. Crane and D. Yetter, A categorical construction of 4D topological quantum field theories, in Quantum Topology (World Scientific, 1993), pp. 120–130, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812796387_0005 ]), are in fact equal. These invariants, both of which degenerate to the 3D Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev model in a special case, had been open for years to clarify their relationship. Despite the seeming difference in their origins and formal constructions, we prove their equivalence. Along the way, we sketch a dictionary between the two models, provide a brief survey of the shadow construction à la Turaev, and suggest once again that the semisimple models have reached their limits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218216524500366
Primary Topic
History and Theory of Mathematics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equivalence of field theories: Crane–Yetter and the shadow

Jin-Cheng Guu
Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications
History and Theory of Mathematics
article

Equivalence of field theories: Crane–Yetter and the shadow

Jin-Cheng Guu
article en

Abstract

This work solves a 28-year conjecture by showing that two major invariants of smooth 4-manifolds, the shadow model (motivated by statistical mechanics [V. G. Turaev, Topology of shadows (1991)]) and the simplicial Crane–Yetter model (motivated by topological quantum field theory [L. Crane and D. Yetter, A categorical construction of 4D topological quantum field theories, in Quantum Topology (World Scientific, 1993), pp. 120–130, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812796387_0005 ]), are in fact equal. These invariants, both of which degenerate to the 3D Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev model in a special case, had been open for years to clarify their relationship. Despite the seeming difference in their origins and formal constructions, we prove their equivalence. Along the way, we sketch a dictionary between the two models, provide a brief survey of the shadow construction à la Turaev, and suggest once again that the semisimple models have reached their limits.

Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications
University of Alberta (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
History and Theory of Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.