Evaluation of post-surgical complications between Ó?Rendez-vousÓ� technique vs. standard care in patients with choledocholithiasis
Background: "Rendez-vous" (RV) technique is a mixed-technique which uses both laparoscopic and endoscopic skills; however, the evidence is contradictory regarding the implementation of this technique or the 2-step sequential technique (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LC]) in the management of cholecysto-choledocholitiasis. Objective:To estimate the association between the implementation of RV technique and the presence of post-surgical complications as primary outcome, using as comparator the 2-step sequential technique.Method: An observational, analytical, retrospective study was conducted, using as exposed cohort the medical records from patients with a diagnosis of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, or mild biliary pancreatitis.The exposed cohort underwent RV technique, while the unexposed cohort were those which underwent two step technique.Results: There was a lower post-surgical complication rate in the RV group (0%) compared with the 10.1% (p = 0.3617) in the control group.Also, RV technique showed a lesser hospitalization time (p = 0.0377) and a lesser post-surgical hospitalization time (p < 0.0001).Conclusions: RV technique is superior when compared with the 2-step sequential technique (ERCP followed by LC), based on a better surgical success rate, a fewer complications rate and less hospitalization time.
Authors
- Juan Felipe Coronado-Sarmiento (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0470-9370)
- Óscar J. Barrera-León
- Osvaldo C. Barraza-Leones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9434-0000)
- Eduardo Valdivieso Rueda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-0904)
- Enrique Carlos Ramos Clason (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-5800)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cirugía y Cirujanos (English Edition)
- Published
- 2024-09-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.24875/cirue.m21000643
- Primary Topic
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00