PUSHKIN’S CODE IN THE EPISTOLARY HOAX OF I. S. TURGENEV

In the article, the letter of I. S. Turgenev to P. V. Annenkov dated October 14 (old style), 1853, is for the first time considered as a “cryptographic text,” as a kind of response to Annenkov’s completion of preparations for the publication of Pushkin’s biography and writings. Although Pushkin’s name is not mentioned in the letter itself, “Pushkin’s presence” is encoded in different ways: in the initial “prosaic” part of the letter — in the form of associatively concealed hints about Pushkin’s work and the facts of the poet’s biography, and in the second part, in the Easter poem, it receives its explicit designation by an intertextual reference: “The past has opened up before me.” In the article, the Easter poem is analyzed not from the point of view of the problem of its authorship, which has not been completely solved, but as a manifestation of Turgenev’s artistic consciousness. The writer uses cryptographic hints to evaluate Annenkov’s contribution to the salvation of Pushkin’s name, “among other names doomed to oblivion” (as he will recall in a speech about Pushkin in 1880), in the categories of Paschal, “great and joyful news,” in the light of which the event of the Resurrection of Christ becomes an “emblem” of Pushkin’s fate, and the image of the poet is perceived as the image of the Resurrected.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИ
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15393/j9.art.2024.14242
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PUSHKIN’S CODE IN THE EPISTOLARY HOAX OF I. S. TURGENEV

Gennady Yu. Karpenko
ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИ
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

PUSHKIN’S CODE IN THE EPISTOLARY HOAX OF I. S. TURGENEV

Gennady Yu. Karpenko
article en

Abstract

In the article, the letter of I. S. Turgenev to P. V. Annenkov dated October 14 (old style), 1853, is for the first time considered as a “cryptographic text,” as a kind of response to Annenkov’s completion of preparations for the publication of Pushkin’s biography and writings. Although Pushkin’s name is not mentioned in the letter itself, “Pushkin’s presence” is encoded in different ways: in the initial “prosaic” part of the letter — in the form of associatively concealed hints about Pushkin’s work and the facts of the poet’s biography, and in the second part, in the Easter poem, it receives its explicit designation by an intertextual reference: “The past has opened up before me.” In the article, the Easter poem is analyzed not from the point of view of the problem of its authorship, which has not been completely solved, but as a manifestation of Turgenev’s artistic consciousness. The writer uses cryptographic hints to evaluate Annenkov’s contribution to the salvation of Pushkin’s name, “among other names doomed to oblivion” (as he will recall in a speech about Pushkin in 1880), in the categories of Paschal, “great and joyful news,” in the light of which the event of the Resurrection of Christ becomes an “emblem” of Pushkin’s fate, and the image of the poet is perceived as the image of the Resurrected.

ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИVol. 22(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

PUSHKIN’S CODE IN THE EPISTOLARY HOAX OF I. S. TURGENEV — Gennady Yu. Karpenko · ПРОБЛЕМЫ ИСТОРИЧЕСКОЙ ПОЭТИКИ (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS