Deep Shape-Texture Statistics for Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluation

Opinion-Unaware Blind Image Quality Assessment (OU-BIQA) models aim to predict image quality without training on reference images and subjective quality scores. Thereinto, image statistical comparison is a classic paradigm, while the performance is limited by the representation ability of visual descriptors. Deep features as visual descriptors have advanced IQA in recent research, but they are discovered to be highly texture-biased and lack shape-bias. On this basis, we find out that image shape and texture cues respond differently toward distortions, and the absence of either one results in an incomplete image representation. Therefore, to formulate a well-rounded statistical description for images, we utilize the shape-biased and texture-biased deep features produced by Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) simultaneously. More specifically, we design a Shape-Texture Adaptive Fusion (STAF) module to merge shape and texture information, based on which we formulate quality-relevant image statistics. The perceptual quality is quantified by the variant Mahalanobis distance between the inner and outer Deep Shape-Texture Statistics (DSTS), wherein the inner and outer statistics respectively describe the quality fingerprints of the distorted image and natural images. The proposed DSTS delicately utilizes shape-texture statistical relations between different data scales in the deep domain and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) quality prediction performance on images with artificial and authentic distortions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3694977
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Image and Video Quality Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Shape-Texture Statistics for Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluation

Hanwei Zhu, Keyan Ding, Leida Li, Shiqi Wang et al.
3 citations
ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
Image and Video Quality Assessment
0.75
article

Deep Shape-Texture Statistics for Completely Blind Image Quality Evaluation

Hanwei Zhu, Keyan Ding, Leida Li, Shiqi Wang, Yixuan Li, Peilin Chen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Opinion-Unaware Blind Image Quality Assessment (OU-BIQA) models aim to predict image quality without training on reference images and subjective quality scores. Thereinto, image statistical comparison is a classic paradigm, while the performance is limited by the representation ability of visual descriptors. Deep features as visual descriptors have advanced IQA in recent research, but they are discovered to be highly texture-biased and lack shape-bias. On this basis, we find out that image shape and texture cues respond differently toward distortions, and the absence of either one results in an incomplete image representation. Therefore, to formulate a well-rounded statistical description for images, we utilize the shape-biased and texture-biased deep features produced by Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) simultaneously. More specifically, we design a Shape-Texture Adaptive Fusion (STAF) module to merge shape and texture information, based on which we formulate quality-relevant image statistics. The perceptual quality is quantified by the variant Mahalanobis distance between the inner and outer Deep Shape-Texture Statistics (DSTS), wherein the inner and outer statistics respectively describe the quality fingerprints of the distorted image and natural images. The proposed DSTS delicately utilizes shape-texture statistical relations between different data scales in the deep domain and achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) quality prediction performance on images with artificial and authentic distortions.

ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsVol. 20(12)
Xidian University (CN), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Image and Video Quality Assessment
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.