Responses of Leaf Senescence for Stipa krylovii to Interactive Environmental Factors

The effects of temperature, and photoperiod on autumn phenology are well established for many species. However, the impact of multiple environmental factors and their interactions on regulating autumn phenology remains insufficiently explored. A large-scale controlled experiment in an artificial climate chamber was conducted from April to October 2021 at the Hebei Gucheng Agricultural Meteorology National Observation and Research Station, Hebei Province. This study aimed to investigate the interactive effects of temperature [T1.5, (1.5 °C above the control), T2, (2 °C above the control)], photoperiod [LP, long photoperiod (4 h photoperiod above the control), SP, short photoperiod (4 h photoperiod below the control)], and nitrogen addition [LN, low nitrogen, (nitrogen at 5 g N·m−2·a−1), MN, medium nitrogen, (nitrogen at 10 g N·m−2·a−1), HN, high nitrogen, (nitrogen at 20 g N·m−2·a−1), control for temperature and photoperiod was the mean monthly temperature and average photoperiod (14 h) from 1989–2020 for Stipa krylovii, while the control for nitrogen treatment was without nitrogen addition] on leaf senescence in Stipa krylovii. A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant effects of temperature, photoperiod, and nitrogen addition on leaf senescence (p < 0.01), with effects varying across different levels of each factor. Increased temperature notably delayed leaf senescence, with delays averaging of 4.0 and 6.3 days for T1.5 and T2, respectively. The LP treatment advanced leaf senescence by an average of 4.0 days, while the SP treatment delayed it by an average of 6.2 days; nitrogen addition advanced leaf senescence, with the effect intensifying as nitrogen levels increased, resulting in average advancements of 1.5, 1.9, and 4.3 days for LN, MN, and HN, respectively. Additionally, we observed that temperature altered the sensitivity of leaf senescence to the photoperiod, diminishing the advancement caused by LP at 2 °C and amplifying the delay caused by SP. These findings underscore the differential impacts of these three factors on the leaf senescence of Stipa krylovii and provide critical insights into plant phenology in response to varying environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responses of Leaf Senescence for Stipa krylovii to Interactive Environmental Factors

Xingyang Song, Guangsheng Zhou
1 citations
Agronomy
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
0.60
article

Responses of Leaf Senescence for Stipa krylovii to Interactive Environmental Factors

Xingyang Song, Guangsheng Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The effects of temperature, and photoperiod on autumn phenology are well established for many species. However, the impact of multiple environmental factors and their interactions on regulating autumn phenology remains insufficiently explored. A large-scale controlled experiment in an artificial climate chamber was conducted from April to October 2021 at the Hebei Gucheng Agricultural Meteorology National Observation and Research Station, Hebei Province. This study aimed to investigate the interactive effects of temperature [T1.5, (1.5 °C above the control), T2, (2 °C above the control)], photoperiod [LP, long photoperiod (4 h photoperiod above the control), SP, short photoperiod (4 h photoperiod below the control)], and nitrogen addition [LN, low nitrogen, (nitrogen at 5 g N·m−2·a−1), MN, medium nitrogen, (nitrogen at 10 g N·m−2·a−1), HN, high nitrogen, (nitrogen at 20 g N·m−2·a−1), control for temperature and photoperiod was the mean monthly temperature and average photoperiod (14 h) from 1989–2020 for Stipa krylovii, while the control for nitrogen treatment was without nitrogen addition] on leaf senescence in Stipa krylovii. A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed significant effects of temperature, photoperiod, and nitrogen addition on leaf senescence (p < 0.01), with effects varying across different levels of each factor. Increased temperature notably delayed leaf senescence, with delays averaging of 4.0 and 6.3 days for T1.5 and T2, respectively. The LP treatment advanced leaf senescence by an average of 4.0 days, while the SP treatment delayed it by an average of 6.2 days; nitrogen addition advanced leaf senescence, with the effect intensifying as nitrogen levels increased, resulting in average advancements of 1.5, 1.9, and 4.3 days for LN, MN, and HN, respectively. Additionally, we observed that temperature altered the sensitivity of leaf senescence to the photoperiod, diminishing the advancement caused by LP at 2 °C and amplifying the delay caused by SP. These findings underscore the differential impacts of these three factors on the leaf senescence of Stipa krylovii and provide critical insights into plant phenology in response to varying environmental conditions.

AgronomyVol. 14(9)
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Hebei Meteorological Bureau (CN), Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.