Validity and reliability of the discrepancy evaluation instrument for measuring inequality in the online learning

<span lang="EN-US">This study aimed to demonstrate a valid and reliable discrepancy evaluation instrument. It was for measuring inequality in the online learning process for mathematics education research subjects. The approach to this research was instrument development, which focuses on several stages, including defining variables, describing variables into more detailed indicators, compiling instrument items, conducting instrument trials, and analyzing the results of instrument trials. The subjects involved in the content validity test were two experts, while the reliability test was 40 students. The result analysis of the content validity test used the Gregory formula. The result analysis of the reliability test results used the Cronbach alpha formula. It indicated that the results of the instrument content validity were very good, and the reliability test results were in the moderate category. The resulting impact of this study on educational evaluation development was new knowledge, especially for evaluators of mathematics education, about the importance of content validity and reliability of the discrepancy evaluation instrument used to measure inequality in the online learning process in mathematics education research subjects.</span>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.28106
Primary Topic
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of the discrepancy evaluation instrument for measuring inequality in the online learning

I Putu Wisna Ariawan, I Made Ardana, Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana, I Made Sugiarta et al.
1 links
International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
article

Validity and reliability of the discrepancy evaluation instrument for measuring inequality in the online learning

I Putu Wisna Ariawan, I Made Ardana, Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana, I Made Sugiarta, Gusti Ayu Dessy Sugiharni, I Komang Gede Sukawijana
article en

Abstract

<span lang="EN-US">This study aimed to demonstrate a valid and reliable discrepancy evaluation instrument. It was for measuring inequality in the online learning process for mathematics education research subjects. The approach to this research was instrument development, which focuses on several stages, including defining variables, describing variables into more detailed indicators, compiling instrument items, conducting instrument trials, and analyzing the results of instrument trials. The subjects involved in the content validity test were two experts, while the reliability test was 40 students. The result analysis of the content validity test used the Gregory formula. The result analysis of the reliability test results used the Cronbach alpha formula. It indicated that the results of the instrument content validity were very good, and the reliability test results were in the moderate category. The resulting impact of this study on educational evaluation development was new knowledge, especially for evaluators of mathematics education, about the importance of content validity and reliability of the discrepancy evaluation instrument used to measure inequality in the online learning process in mathematics education research subjects.</span>

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)Vol. 13(6)
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (ID), Institut Bisnis Nusantara (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.