Examining the Impact of Vulnerability and the Law of Justice on the IFRS Adoption Decision

We investigate the impact of vulnerability and the law of justice indicators on the decision to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by 133 countries. Applying robust Logit and Probit models to 2021 cross-sectional data, we find that the absence of corruption, state illegitimacy, a well-functioning civil justice system, and insufficient public services are helpful for IFRS adoption. On the other hand, results show that a country’s uneven economic development and human rights violations are detrimental to IFRS adoption. Our research confirms that requiring higher standards for financial and accounting reporting in the media, allocating sufficient budget amounts to support an equitable civil justice system, and coordinating efforts to reduce or eliminate economic inequality may help IFRS adoption. We argue that highlighting the positive benefits of IFRS adoption and the commensurate constructive policy outcomes may add the emphasis needed to convince governmental leaders to move toward IFRS adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17090417
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Impact of Vulnerability and the Law of Justice on the IFRS Adoption Decision

J. Reid Cummings, Khandokar Istiak, Robert Forrester, Macy Adams
Journal of risk and financial management
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Examining the Impact of Vulnerability and the Law of Justice on the IFRS Adoption Decision

J. Reid Cummings, Khandokar Istiak, Robert Forrester, Macy Adams
article en

Abstract

We investigate the impact of vulnerability and the law of justice indicators on the decision to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by 133 countries. Applying robust Logit and Probit models to 2021 cross-sectional data, we find that the absence of corruption, state illegitimacy, a well-functioning civil justice system, and insufficient public services are helpful for IFRS adoption. On the other hand, results show that a country’s uneven economic development and human rights violations are detrimental to IFRS adoption. Our research confirms that requiring higher standards for financial and accounting reporting in the media, allocating sufficient budget amounts to support an equitable civil justice system, and coordinating efforts to reduce or eliminate economic inequality may help IFRS adoption. We argue that highlighting the positive benefits of IFRS adoption and the commensurate constructive policy outcomes may add the emphasis needed to convince governmental leaders to move toward IFRS adoption.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 17(9)
Midwestern State University (US), University of South Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining the Impact of Vulnerability and the Law of Justice on the IFRS Adoption Decision — J. Reid Cummings, Khandokar Istiak, et al. · Journal of risk and financial management (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS