Development of the ‘Healthy Eating Index for Older People’ to Measure Adherence to Dietary Guidelines in Healthy Older New Zealand Adults

This study aimed to develop the ‘Healthy Eating Index for Older People’ (the index), based on New Zealand dietary guidelines, and measures the validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to derive the index scores in older adults. In Auckland, New Zealand, participants (community-dwelling adults aged 65–74 years, [n = 273, 36% male]) completed a 109-item FFQ administered one month apart (FFQ1, FFQ2), with a four-day food record (4-DFR) collected in between. Adherence to the guidelines was scored using the index, comprising a total score (maximum = 100) and two sub-scores: adequacy (maximum = 60) and moderation (maximum = 40). A comparison of FFQ1 and FFQ2 determined reproducibility, and FFQ1 and 4-DFR determined validity. Higher index scores (from FFQ1) were associated with higher intakes of protein, fibre, vitamins and minerals and lower intakes of alcohol and saturated fats (nutrients from 4-DFR) after adjusting for age and sex (all p < 0.001). Total index and sub-indices correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.77 (all p < 0.001); weighted kappa values ranged from 0.35 to 0.67; and mean differences were all <10% of FFQ1 for reproducibility and validity. The Bland–Altman analysis showed no bias for the total index score for reproducibility and validity. However, with validation, the sub-index scores became less reliable as food intake increased (p < 0.05). The index applied to the FFQ demonstrated good construct validity and reproducibility. Relative and absolute validity were acceptable, though caution is required when using the absolute sub-index scores. The index is suitable for measuring total diet quality in older New Zealand adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dietetics
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dietetics3030028
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the ‘Healthy Eating Index for Older People’ to Measure Adherence to Dietary Guidelines in Healthy Older New Zealand Adults

Jamie V. de Seymour, Cheryl S. Gammon, Kathryn L. Beck, Pamela R. von Hurst et al.
Dietetics
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Development of the ‘Healthy Eating Index for Older People’ to Measure Adherence to Dietary Guidelines in Healthy Older New Zealand Adults

Jamie V. de Seymour, Cheryl S. Gammon, Kathryn L. Beck, Pamela R. von Hurst, Cathryn Anne Conlon, Karen Mumme, H. Guy
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop the ‘Healthy Eating Index for Older People’ (the index), based on New Zealand dietary guidelines, and measures the validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to derive the index scores in older adults. In Auckland, New Zealand, participants (community-dwelling adults aged 65–74 years, [n = 273, 36% male]) completed a 109-item FFQ administered one month apart (FFQ1, FFQ2), with a four-day food record (4-DFR) collected in between. Adherence to the guidelines was scored using the index, comprising a total score (maximum = 100) and two sub-scores: adequacy (maximum = 60) and moderation (maximum = 40). A comparison of FFQ1 and FFQ2 determined reproducibility, and FFQ1 and 4-DFR determined validity. Higher index scores (from FFQ1) were associated with higher intakes of protein, fibre, vitamins and minerals and lower intakes of alcohol and saturated fats (nutrients from 4-DFR) after adjusting for age and sex (all p < 0.001). Total index and sub-indices correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 to 0.77 (all p < 0.001); weighted kappa values ranged from 0.35 to 0.67; and mean differences were all <10% of FFQ1 for reproducibility and validity. The Bland–Altman analysis showed no bias for the total index score for reproducibility and validity. However, with validation, the sub-index scores became less reliable as food intake increased (p < 0.05). The index applied to the FFQ demonstrated good construct validity and reproducibility. Relative and absolute validity were acceptable, though caution is required when using the absolute sub-index scores. The index is suitable for measuring total diet quality in older New Zealand adults.

DieteticsVol. 3(3)
Massey University (NZ)
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.