An Analysis of Research Data Storage Systems

The scientific protocols, experiments and instruments that generate data are an integral part of the research lifecycle. Consequently, almost every scientific research institution requires a Research Data Storage System (RDSS). However, RDSS implementations vary significantly due to factors that include cost, geography, workloads, policy, risk tolerance and available technical skills. A RDSS may be on premises, in the public cloud or a mixture of both. Previously we identified 10 key high level features of a RDSS and defined an abstract high-level Research Data Reference Architecture (RDRA). Together, these features enable data fabrics, creating repeatable and consistent structures for low friction, highly efficient data movement and near real time data analysis for decision making and scientific workflows. We build on this earlier work in this paper to present a new Research Data Implementation Architecture (RDIA) that meets the RDRA and can guide implementations without locking in any specific product or service. This paper presents and compares six significant RDSSs and shows how they meet both the RDIA and therefore the RDRA. We identify a new structure – the Research Data Storage System Aggregator (RDSS-A) that describes clusters of RDSSs, and survey five such instances. Finally, we provide a real-world validation of the RDIA by documenting the technical specification of a real RDSS. The new work both clarifies a complex landscape, and aids groups building new systems or adopting existing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/e-science62913.2024.10678706
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis of Research Data Storage Systems

David Abramson, Jake Carroll, Bronis R. de Supinski
2 citations
Technology and Data Analysis
1.56
article

An Analysis of Research Data Storage Systems

David Abramson, Jake Carroll, Bronis R. de Supinski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The scientific protocols, experiments and instruments that generate data are an integral part of the research lifecycle. Consequently, almost every scientific research institution requires a Research Data Storage System (RDSS). However, RDSS implementations vary significantly due to factors that include cost, geography, workloads, policy, risk tolerance and available technical skills. A RDSS may be on premises, in the public cloud or a mixture of both. Previously we identified 10 key high level features of a RDSS and defined an abstract high-level Research Data Reference Architecture (RDRA). Together, these features enable data fabrics, creating repeatable and consistent structures for low friction, highly efficient data movement and near real time data analysis for decision making and scientific workflows. We build on this earlier work in this paper to present a new Research Data Implementation Architecture (RDIA) that meets the RDRA and can guide implementations without locking in any specific product or service. This paper presents and compares six significant RDSSs and shows how they meet both the RDIA and therefore the RDRA. We identify a new structure – the Research Data Storage System Aggregator (RDSS-A) that describes clusters of RDSSs, and survey five such instances. Finally, we provide a real-world validation of the RDIA by documenting the technical specification of a real RDSS. The new work both clarifies a complex landscape, and aids groups building new systems or adopting existing systems.

The University of Queensland (AU), Lawrence Livermore National Security (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Technology and Data Analysis
1.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.