AI for precision medicine must keep non-random complexity in mind to support equity in outcomes

Large Models (LMs) as a new form of artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to provide more personal insights by processing large volumes of multimodal, longitudinal data now generated by hundreds of millions of people through things like wearables, apps, and centralized systems such as electronic medical records. Medical research has historically excluded most populations (women and minorities) to the effect that treatments are routinely less effective and sometimes harmful in these populations. Machine Learning (ML) in medicine was supposed to solve these problems, but in many cases exacerbated these harmful historical biases. LMs project an illusion of understanding that might lead some to repeat the omissions of the past, and once again exacerbate unfair and harmful outcomes. But human physiology is both deeply complex and structured. Health AI researchers can incorporate insights from both biology and historical failures to help Health AIs realize the goal of equitable health support more completely than previous efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/e-science62913.2024.10678664
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI for precision medicine must keep non-random complexity in mind to support equity in outcomes

Benjamin L. Smarr
2 citations
Machine Learning in Healthcare
0.69
article

AI for precision medicine must keep non-random complexity in mind to support equity in outcomes

Benjamin L. Smarr
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Large Models (LMs) as a new form of artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to provide more personal insights by processing large volumes of multimodal, longitudinal data now generated by hundreds of millions of people through things like wearables, apps, and centralized systems such as electronic medical records. Medical research has historically excluded most populations (women and minorities) to the effect that treatments are routinely less effective and sometimes harmful in these populations. Machine Learning (ML) in medicine was supposed to solve these problems, but in many cases exacerbated these harmful historical biases. LMs project an illusion of understanding that might lead some to repeat the omissions of the past, and once again exacerbate unfair and harmful outcomes. But human physiology is both deeply complex and structured. Health AI researchers can incorporate insights from both biology and historical failures to help Health AIs realize the goal of equitable health support more completely than previous efforts.

University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.