Efficient Algorithms for Constructing Minimum-Weight Codewords in Some Extended Binary BCH Codes

We present <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$O(m^{3})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> algorithms for specifying the support of minimum-weight codewords of extended binary BCH codes of length <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n=2^{m}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$d(m,s,i):=2^{m-1-s}-2^{m-1-i-s}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for some values of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m,i,s$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, where m may grow to infinity. Here, the support is specified as the sum of two sets: a set of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2^{2i-1}-2^{i-1}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> elements, and a subspace of dimension <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m-2i-s$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, specified by a basis. In some detail, for designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$6\cdot 2^{j}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$j\in \{0,\ldots ,m-4\}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, we have a deterministic algorithm for even <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m\geq 4$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and a probabilistic algorithm with success probability <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1-O(2^{-m})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for odd <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m\gt 4$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. For designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$28\cdot 2^{j}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$j\in \{0,\ldots , m-6\}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, we have a probabilistic algorithm with success probability <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\geq \frac {1}{3}-O(2^{-m/2})$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for even <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m\geq 6$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Finally, for designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$120\cdot 2^{j}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$j\in \{0,\ldots , m-8\}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, we have a deterministic algorithm for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m\geq 8$ </tex-math></inline-formula> divisible by 4. We also show how Gold functions can be used to find the support of minimum-weight words for designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$d(m,s,i)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> (for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$i\in \{0,\ldots ,\lfloor m/2\rfloor \}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$s\leq m-2i$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) whenever <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2i|m$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. Our construction builds on results of Kasami and Lin, who proved that for extended binary BCH codes of designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$d(m,s,i)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> (for integers <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$m\geq 2$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0\leq i\leq \lfloor m/2\rfloor $ </tex-math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0\leq s\leq m-2i$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), the minimum distance equals the designed distance. The proof of Kasami and Lin makes use of a non-constructive existence result of Berlekamp, and a constructive “down-conversion theorem” that converts some words in BCH codes to lower-weight words in BCH codes of lower designed distance. Our main contribution is in replacing the non-constructive counting argument of Berlekamp by a low-complexity algorithm. In one aspect, the current paper extends the results of Grigorescu and Kaufman, who presented explicit minimum-weight codewords for extended binary BCH codes of designed distance exactly 6 (and hence also for designed distance <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$6\cdot 2^{j}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, by a well-known “up-conversion theorem”), as we cover more cases of the minimum distance. In fact, we prove that the codeword constructed by Grigorescu and Kaufman is a special case of the current construction. However, the minimum-weight codewords we construct do not generate the code, and are not affine generators, except, possibly, for a designed distance of 6.