Mission Reproducibility: An Investigation on Reproducibility Issues in Machine Learning and Information Retrieval Research

This paper analyzes the most common problems limiting reproducibility of Information Retrieval research and provides researchers with insights and guidelines to improve the reproducibility of experiments and to allow the verification of obtained results. We conducted a study on 45 reproduction reports off 17 different papers, which have been published at renowned IR conferences. We analyzed the reports qualitatively and quantitatively and looked into the different insights from different groups. Occurring problems are classified into three problem families and 13 categories and afre then analyzed with respect to their influence on the reproduction process as well as on their frequency of appearance over time and per conference. Of these 17 different papers, 14 papers were reproducible to a certain degree without significant differences to the original results, but in many cases not the whole experiment was reproducible due to missing code, information or data. Also, we look at assumptions that were made when reproducing the different papers, as some experiment workflows were incomplete and information was missing. In addition, we propose recommendations to make machine learning research more reproducible and FAIR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/e-science62913.2024.10678657
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mission Reproducibility: An Investigation on Reproducibility Issues in Machine Learning and Information Retrieval Research

Tomasz Miksa, Allan Hanbury, Bettina Kern, Andreas Rauber et al.
2 citations
Big Data and Business Intelligence
1.06
article

Mission Reproducibility: An Investigation on Reproducibility Issues in Machine Learning and Information Retrieval Research

Tomasz Miksa, Allan Hanbury, Bettina Kern, Andreas Rauber, Moritz Staudinger, Peter Knees, Lukas Arnhold
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes the most common problems limiting reproducibility of Information Retrieval research and provides researchers with insights and guidelines to improve the reproducibility of experiments and to allow the verification of obtained results. We conducted a study on 45 reproduction reports off 17 different papers, which have been published at renowned IR conferences. We analyzed the reports qualitatively and quantitatively and looked into the different insights from different groups. Occurring problems are classified into three problem families and 13 categories and afre then analyzed with respect to their influence on the reproduction process as well as on their frequency of appearance over time and per conference. Of these 17 different papers, 14 papers were reproducible to a certain degree without significant differences to the original results, but in many cases not the whole experiment was reproducible due to missing code, information or data. Also, we look at assumptions that were made when reproducing the different papers, as some experiment workflows were incomplete and information was missing. In addition, we propose recommendations to make machine learning research more reproducible and FAIR.

TU Wien (AT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.