Robust and Bayesian Subspace Identification

Model estimates obtained from traditional subspace identification methods may be subject to significant variance. This elevated variance is aggravated in the cases of high-dimensional models, limited sample size, or high noise level. Common solutions in statistics to reduce the effect of variance are regularized estimators, shrinkage estimators, and Bayesian estimation. In the current work, we investigate the latter two solutions, which are relatively unexplored in subspace identification methods. Our experimental results, from a large random sample of system models, show that our proposed estimators reduce the median of estimation risks by 10% compared with traditional subspace methods. In the case of large measurement noise, this median estimation risk was reduced by 34%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2024.3465560
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Control Systems and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust and Bayesian Subspace Identification

Alexandre R. Mesquita
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Control Systems and Identification
0.33
article

Robust and Bayesian Subspace Identification

Alexandre R. Mesquita
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Model estimates obtained from traditional subspace identification methods may be subject to significant variance. This elevated variance is aggravated in the cases of high-dimensional models, limited sample size, or high noise level. Common solutions in statistics to reduce the effect of variance are regularized estimators, shrinkage estimators, and Bayesian estimation. In the current work, we investigate the latter two solutions, which are relatively unexplored in subspace identification methods. Our experimental results, from a large random sample of system models, show that our proposed estimators reduce the median of estimation risks by 10% compared with traditional subspace methods. In the case of large measurement noise, this median estimation risk was reduced by 34%.

IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlVol. 70(2)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Control Systems and Identification
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.