Policy Algebraic Equation for the Discrete-Time Linear Quadratic Regulator Problem

The discrete-time, infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator (LQR) is studied with the objective of establishing a unified perspective on the problem by relying simultaneously on Dynamic Programming and the discrete Minimum Principle. While it is well known that the two strategies <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">independently</i> yield the optimal solution, it is shown here that their <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">combination</i> provides much deeper insights on the nature of the optimal solution and on the strategies by means of which it can be computed. More precisely, the optimal cost, captured by the matrix P, and the feedback gain matrix K are jointly related via the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">observability matrix</i> of the underlying state/costate (Hamiltonian) dynamics when the state alone is measured. Such an abstract property is then instrumental for deriving alternative characterizations of the optimal solution. First, an algebraic equation, referred to as the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">policy algebraic equation</i>, is established in the variable K alone and with dimension typically much smaller than the size of the classic ARE arising in discrete-time LQR, although comprising polynomial equations of higher degree. This equation permits the direct construction of the optimal feedback gain (i.e., the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">actor</i>) without the need for the simultaneous computation of the optimal cost (i.e., the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">critic</i>). The structure of the policy algebraic equation naturally lends itself to an iterative approach towards its solution, which is restricted to the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">space of policies alone</i> and which does not require the explicit solution of any intermediate (linear) equation at each step. Furthermore, as a consequence of the above properties, it is possible to derive a Riccati equation in P, although with coefficients defined by polynomial functions of K, with the property that the constant and quadratic terms are symmetric and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">sign-definite</i>. This aspect is remarkably different from the classic ARE associated to the discrete-time LQR and more akin to the continuous-time counterpart.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.2024.3465566
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Algebraic Equation for the Discrete-Time Linear Quadratic Regulator Problem

Mario Sassano
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
0.66
article

Policy Algebraic Equation for the Discrete-Time Linear Quadratic Regulator Problem

Mario Sassano
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The discrete-time, infinite-horizon linear quadratic regulator (LQR) is studied with the objective of establishing a unified perspective on the problem by relying simultaneously on Dynamic Programming and the discrete Minimum Principle. While it is well known that the two strategies <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">independently</i> yield the optimal solution, it is shown here that their <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">combination</i> provides much deeper insights on the nature of the optimal solution and on the strategies by means of which it can be computed. More precisely, the optimal cost, captured by the matrix P, and the feedback gain matrix K are jointly related via the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">observability matrix</i> of the underlying state/costate (Hamiltonian) dynamics when the state alone is measured. Such an abstract property is then instrumental for deriving alternative characterizations of the optimal solution. First, an algebraic equation, referred to as the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">policy algebraic equation</i>, is established in the variable K alone and with dimension typically much smaller than the size of the classic ARE arising in discrete-time LQR, although comprising polynomial equations of higher degree. This equation permits the direct construction of the optimal feedback gain (i.e., the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">actor</i>) without the need for the simultaneous computation of the optimal cost (i.e., the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">critic</i>). The structure of the policy algebraic equation naturally lends itself to an iterative approach towards its solution, which is restricted to the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">space of policies alone</i> and which does not require the explicit solution of any intermediate (linear) equation at each step. Furthermore, as a consequence of the above properties, it is possible to derive a Riccati equation in P, although with coefficients defined by polynomial functions of K, with the property that the constant and quadratic terms are symmetric and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">sign-definite</i>. This aspect is remarkably different from the classic ARE associated to the discrete-time LQR and more akin to the continuous-time counterpart.

IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlVol. 70(4)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.