Who Are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections

Faith in American elections is eroding, with politicians frequently questioning the legitimacy of election results and spreading misinformation about voter fraud. Substantial work has been done to refute misinformation and increase confidence in elections, but often without a clear picture of who skeptics are and why they are skeptical. Using a nationally representative survey from around the 2022 midterm election ( N = 5,244) and beyond ( N = 77,325), we provide a comprehensive profile of election skeptics: their prevalence, views, and justifications. Our use of quantitative and qualitative data reveals a more milquetoast portrait of skeptics. Skeptics are demographically closer to the broader electorate than not, and the self-reported underpinnings of skepticism are more mundane than conspiratorial. Over half of skeptics claim they are skeptical because of how elections are run and nearly one-in-five skeptics claim they are skeptical because of the other party’s performance in recent elections, which we corroborate through an event study of the 2022 election.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2024.0010
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections

Sean Westwood, Derek Holliday, Yphtach Lelkes, Justin Grimmer
2 citations
Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
article

Who Are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections

Sean Westwood, Derek Holliday, Yphtach Lelkes, Justin Grimmer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Faith in American elections is eroding, with politicians frequently questioning the legitimacy of election results and spreading misinformation about voter fraud. Substantial work has been done to refute misinformation and increase confidence in elections, but often without a clear picture of who skeptics are and why they are skeptical. Using a nationally representative survey from around the 2022 midterm election ( N = 5,244) and beyond ( N = 77,325), we provide a comprehensive profile of election skeptics: their prevalence, views, and justifications. Our use of quantitative and qualitative data reveals a more milquetoast portrait of skeptics. Skeptics are demographically closer to the broader electorate than not, and the self-reported underpinnings of skepticism are more mundane than conspiratorial. Over half of skeptics claim they are skeptical because of how elections are run and nearly one-in-five skeptics claim they are skeptical because of the other party’s performance in recent elections, which we corroborate through an event study of the 2022 election.

Election Law Journal Rules Politics and PolicyVol. 24(1)
Dartmouth College (US), Stanford Health Care (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who Are the Election Skeptics? Evidence from the 2022 Midterm Elections — Sean Westwood, Derek Holliday, et al. · Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS