The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic

Sex-differential selection (SDS), which occurs when the fitness effects of alleles differ between males and females, can have profound impacts on the maintenance of genetic variation, disease risk, and other key aspects of natural populations. Because the sexes mix their autosomal genomes each generation, quantifying SDS is not possible using conventional population genetic approaches. Here, we introduce a method that exploits subtle sex differences in haplotype frequencies resulting from SDS acting in the current generation. Using data from 300K individuals in the UK Biobank, we estimate the strength of SDS throughout the genome. While only a handful of loci under SDS are individually significant, we uncover highly polygenic signals of genome-wide SDS for both viability and fecundity. Selection coefficients of [Formula: see text] may be typical. Despite its ubiquity, SDS may impose a mortality load of less than 1%. An interesting life-history tradeoff emerges: Alleles that increase viability more strongly in females than males tend to increase fecundity more strongly in males than in females. Finally, we find marginal evidence of SDS on fecundity acting on alleles affecting arm fat-free mass. Taken together, our findings connect the long-standing evidence of SDS acting on human phenotypes with its impact on the genome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2412315121
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic

Mark Kirkpatrick, Matthew J. Ming, Jared M. Cole, Carly B. Scott et al.
7 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
3.85
article

The battle of the sexes in humans is highly polygenic

Mark Kirkpatrick, Matthew J. Ming, Jared M. Cole, Carly B. Scott, Jedidiah Carlson, Mackenzie M. Johnson, Arbel Harpak, Peter R. Golightly
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Sex-differential selection (SDS), which occurs when the fitness effects of alleles differ between males and females, can have profound impacts on the maintenance of genetic variation, disease risk, and other key aspects of natural populations. Because the sexes mix their autosomal genomes each generation, quantifying SDS is not possible using conventional population genetic approaches. Here, we introduce a method that exploits subtle sex differences in haplotype frequencies resulting from SDS acting in the current generation. Using data from 300K individuals in the UK Biobank, we estimate the strength of SDS throughout the genome. While only a handful of loci under SDS are individually significant, we uncover highly polygenic signals of genome-wide SDS for both viability and fecundity. Selection coefficients of [Formula: see text] may be typical. Despite its ubiquity, SDS may impose a mortality load of less than 1%. An interesting life-history tradeoff emerges: Alleles that increase viability more strongly in females than males tend to increase fecundity more strongly in males than in females. Finally, we find marginal evidence of SDS on fecundity acting on alleles affecting arm fat-free mass. Taken together, our findings connect the long-standing evidence of SDS acting on human phenotypes with its impact on the genome.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(39)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
3.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.