An interpretable machine learning-based breast cancer classification using XGBoost, SHAP, and LIME

Globally, breast cancer is among the most prevalent and deadly tumors that affect women. Early and accurate identification of breast cancer is essential for effective treatment planning and improving patient outcomes. This research focuses on improving breast cancer classification accuracy through machine learning (ML) methodologies, emphasizing interpretability. The study utilized the chi-square method to enhance model testing performance by pinpointing the most significant features for further analysis. The study also improved data quality by identifying and removing outliers, thus minimizing the influence of data irregularities on the performance of the models. For classification, the study evaluated six different ML algorithms—namely extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), AdaBoost (AB), support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting (GB), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN)—each applied to distinguish between the two variants of breast cancer. Among these, the XGBoost classifier emerged as the most accurate, achieving an impressive 99.30% accuracy rate. Moreover, the research incorporated shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) methods to boost the interpretability of the proposed model, offering crucial insights into the model’s decision-making process. Applying these interpretability techniques provided significant insights into the predictive factors influencing healthcare outcomes, ensuring the classification approach’s transparency and reliability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i6.7866
Citations
10
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An interpretable machine learning-based breast cancer classification using XGBoost, SHAP, and LIME

Md. Hasibur Rahman, K. M. Hasan, Monoronjon Dutta, Md Assaduzzaman et al.
10 citations
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
AI in cancer detection
3.47
article

An interpretable machine learning-based breast cancer classification using XGBoost, SHAP, and LIME

Md. Hasibur Rahman, K. M. Hasan, Monoronjon Dutta, Md Assaduzzaman, Alifa Akter
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Globally, breast cancer is among the most prevalent and deadly tumors that affect women. Early and accurate identification of breast cancer is essential for effective treatment planning and improving patient outcomes. This research focuses on improving breast cancer classification accuracy through machine learning (ML) methodologies, emphasizing interpretability. The study utilized the chi-square method to enhance model testing performance by pinpointing the most significant features for further analysis. The study also improved data quality by identifying and removing outliers, thus minimizing the influence of data irregularities on the performance of the models. For classification, the study evaluated six different ML algorithms—namely extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), AdaBoost (AB), support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting (GB), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN)—each applied to distinguish between the two variants of breast cancer. Among these, the XGBoost classifier emerged as the most accurate, achieving an impressive 99.30% accuracy rate. Moreover, the research incorporated shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) methods to boost the interpretability of the proposed model, offering crucial insights into the model’s decision-making process. Applying these interpretability techniques provided significant insights into the predictive factors influencing healthcare outcomes, ensuring the classification approach’s transparency and reliability.

Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and InformaticsVol. 13(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
AI in cancer detection
3.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.