Comparing horizontal versus vertical arrangement on the ground resistance values

It is important to compare the horizontal electrodes versus vertical ground electrodes particularly when there is limited area to extend the horizontal ground electrode and hard soil at the deeper soil in order to install the vertical rod electrode. Although all of these can be assessed by computational work, much work has shown that computed resistance values are different than measured resistance values and these computational softwares are not always available to the users. For these reasons, the aim of this paper is to address this shortfall by considering two sites with two-layer soil resistivity model where site 1 with upper layer higher than the lower layer and vice versa for site 2. For the same size of ground electrodes, vertical arrangement is found to have lower ground resistance values, despite higher soil resistivity at the lower layer soil. Soil compaction after backfilling the trench during the installation of horizontal electrode has been identified as the main factor that contributes to differences between the measured and computed resistance values.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v13i6.7944
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Materials for Construction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing horizontal versus vertical arrangement on the ground resistance values

Usman Muhammad, Fazlul Aman, Normiza Mohamad Nor, Miszaina Osman et al.
1 citations
Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics
Smart Materials for Construction
0.13
article

Comparing horizontal versus vertical arrangement on the ground resistance values

Usman Muhammad, Fazlul Aman, Normiza Mohamad Nor, Miszaina Osman, Syakir Azim Shamsul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is important to compare the horizontal electrodes versus vertical ground electrodes particularly when there is limited area to extend the horizontal ground electrode and hard soil at the deeper soil in order to install the vertical rod electrode. Although all of these can be assessed by computational work, much work has shown that computed resistance values are different than measured resistance values and these computational softwares are not always available to the users. For these reasons, the aim of this paper is to address this shortfall by considering two sites with two-layer soil resistivity model where site 1 with upper layer higher than the lower layer and vice versa for site 2. For the same size of ground electrodes, vertical arrangement is found to have lower ground resistance values, despite higher soil resistivity at the lower layer soil. Soil compaction after backfilling the trench during the installation of horizontal electrode has been identified as the main factor that contributes to differences between the measured and computed resistance values.

Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and InformaticsVol. 13(6)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Smart Materials for Construction
0.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing horizontal versus vertical arrangement on the ground resistance values — Usman Muhammad, Fazlul Aman, et al. · Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS