ICRF-specific W sources: Advances in minimization in ASDEX Upgrade and near-field based extrapolations to ITER with W-wall

• Precise ICRF antenna feeding control is crucial to reduce local and remote W sources. • No big influence of propagative ICRF slow wave on ICRF-specific PWIs in ASDEX Upgrade. • Minimum in ICRF near-fields and W sources is robust for various plasma conditions. • ITER antenna compares favorably with ASDEX Upgrade 3-strap antenna. • Conservative 0-D empiric estimates show low ICRF-specific W sources for ITER D-T. Experimental data from the 2022 ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) helium (He) campaign reveals that a lower tungsten (W) content can be achieved during operation of the 3-strap antennas with the W-coated limiters. By fine-tuning of electrical feeding of the 3-strap antennas, the core W content was reduced by about a factor of 2 compared to that during operation of the 2-strap antennas with boron coated limiters at the same power and target plasma. This is in contrast to what is observed in deuterium (D) plasmas, where both types of antennas perform similarly in terms of the W release. A higher significance of remote W sources in He than in D is one plausible explanation. Special AUG experiments in D plasmas, with a density in the SOL reduced to the level relevant for some of the predicted profiles for ITER, show similar characteristics of the near-fields and the sputtering even when the slow wave is propagative. Nevertheless, it is advised for ITER to tailor the SOL profiles by the foreseen local gas injection close to the antenna, to avoid the conditions when the lower hybrid resonance position is approximately aligned with the position the leading edges of the plasma facing components. Based on near-field calculations for the AUG 3-strap and the ITER ICRF antennas using the HFSS code under the same conditions, the experimentally validated RF-sheath rectified voltages of the AUG 3-strap antenna were scaled to the ITER ICRF antenna. Using conservative assumptions, the estimations of the ICRF-specific W sources for ITER were then made for the D-T case with neon seeding. The extrapolation shows that by carefully choosing the electrical feeding, the increment of the W sputtering rate during ITER ICRF operation at up to 20 MW, can be kept (in the worst case) below 10 % of the total W wall rate without ICRF, as well as below 25 % of the W rate at the outboard wall without ICRF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2024.101742
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ICRF-specific W sources: Advances in minimization in ASDEX Upgrade and near-field based extrapolations to ITER with W-wall

R. Ochoukov, G. Urbanczyk, T. Pütterich, Walid Helou et al.
5 citations
Nuclear Materials and Energy
Magnetic confinement fusion research
3.30
article

ICRF-specific W sources: Advances in minimization in ASDEX Upgrade and near-field based extrapolations to ITER with W-wall

R. Ochoukov, G. Urbanczyk, T. Pütterich, Walid Helou, R. Dux, G. Grenfell, R. Bilato, L. Colas, F. Paulus, M. Usoltseva, V. Bobkov, F. Calarco, D. Milanesio
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Precise ICRF antenna feeding control is crucial to reduce local and remote W sources. • No big influence of propagative ICRF slow wave on ICRF-specific PWIs in ASDEX Upgrade. • Minimum in ICRF near-fields and W sources is robust for various plasma conditions. • ITER antenna compares favorably with ASDEX Upgrade 3-strap antenna. • Conservative 0-D empiric estimates show low ICRF-specific W sources for ITER D-T. Experimental data from the 2022 ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) helium (He) campaign reveals that a lower tungsten (W) content can be achieved during operation of the 3-strap antennas with the W-coated limiters. By fine-tuning of electrical feeding of the 3-strap antennas, the core W content was reduced by about a factor of 2 compared to that during operation of the 2-strap antennas with boron coated limiters at the same power and target plasma. This is in contrast to what is observed in deuterium (D) plasmas, where both types of antennas perform similarly in terms of the W release. A higher significance of remote W sources in He than in D is one plausible explanation. Special AUG experiments in D plasmas, with a density in the SOL reduced to the level relevant for some of the predicted profiles for ITER, show similar characteristics of the near-fields and the sputtering even when the slow wave is propagative. Nevertheless, it is advised for ITER to tailor the SOL profiles by the foreseen local gas injection close to the antenna, to avoid the conditions when the lower hybrid resonance position is approximately aligned with the position the leading edges of the plasma facing components. Based on near-field calculations for the AUG 3-strap and the ITER ICRF antennas using the HFSS code under the same conditions, the experimentally validated RF-sheath rectified voltages of the AUG 3-strap antenna were scaled to the ITER ICRF antenna. Using conservative assumptions, the estimations of the ICRF-specific W sources for ITER were then made for the D-T case with neon seeding. The extrapolation shows that by carefully choosing the electrical feeding, the increment of the W sputtering rate during ITER ICRF operation at up to 20 MW, can be kept (in the worst case) below 10 % of the total W wall rate without ICRF, as well as below 25 % of the W rate at the outboard wall without ICRF.

Nuclear Materials and EnergyVol. 41
ITER (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA Cadarache (FR), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE), Institut Jean Lamour (FR)
Instituto Tecnológico y de Energías Renovables, EUROfusion, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
3.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.