Automating Drilling Practices to Compensate for Interactions Between Tool Joints and the Rotating Head

Abstract The use of managed pressure drilling (MPD) equipment on North America land rigs has become more common over the past several years. Standard and heavy weight drill pipe tool joints require more weight to pass through the rotating head than the pipe bodies. The negative impacts of this phenomena on both rate of penetration (ROP) and downhole dynamics have been previously studied and published. Various methods of manually adjusting AutoDriller setpoints have been presented as industry best practices. This paper presents the automation of industry best practices through the rig's process control system. Implementation and scaling across a rig fleet will also be discussed. Using a patented process (Scotvold et al. 2020), an application was developed to run on the rig's process control system, where AutoDriller setpoints are automatically adjusted as the tool joints pass through the rotating head on each stand. Different methods of AutoDriller control can be utilized to achieve the intended result. Design of the application to minimize human error when configuring for specific pipe will be a focus, as well as challenges encountered with this in the past. Numerous examples, methods, and control methods such as manually adding weight across tool joints, using ROP as a control method, and automating the process with different logic will be compared. Analysis of these scenarios will demonstrate the value of consistency by removing as much human intervention and setup from the operation as possible. This paper presents the full automation of industry best practices that have historically been conducted through repetitive manual tasks. In addition, there is a strong focus on improving system autonomy going forward to minimize the level of human intervention and setup that is required for optimal performance while drilling with MPD equipment. Ease of scalability for automating this process will also be discussed as it was a major consideration when developing the application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/220690-ms
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating Drilling Practices to Compensate for Interactions Between Tool Joints and the Rotating Head

David Forrest P. Eng, Ashley Fernandes, Raymond Fischer, Aaron Eddy et al.
4 citations
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
Drilling and Well Engineering
2.75
article

Automating Drilling Practices to Compensate for Interactions Between Tool Joints and the Rotating Head

David Forrest P. Eng, Ashley Fernandes, Raymond Fischer, Aaron Eddy, James Waldner, Sean Scotvold P. Eng, C. Eng
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The use of managed pressure drilling (MPD) equipment on North America land rigs has become more common over the past several years. Standard and heavy weight drill pipe tool joints require more weight to pass through the rotating head than the pipe bodies. The negative impacts of this phenomena on both rate of penetration (ROP) and downhole dynamics have been previously studied and published. Various methods of manually adjusting AutoDriller setpoints have been presented as industry best practices. This paper presents the automation of industry best practices through the rig's process control system. Implementation and scaling across a rig fleet will also be discussed. Using a patented process (Scotvold et al. 2020), an application was developed to run on the rig's process control system, where AutoDriller setpoints are automatically adjusted as the tool joints pass through the rotating head on each stand. Different methods of AutoDriller control can be utilized to achieve the intended result. Design of the application to minimize human error when configuring for specific pipe will be a focus, as well as challenges encountered with this in the past. Numerous examples, methods, and control methods such as manually adding weight across tool joints, using ROP as a control method, and automating the process with different logic will be compared. Analysis of these scenarios will demonstrate the value of consistency by removing as much human intervention and setup from the operation as possible. This paper presents the full automation of industry best practices that have historically been conducted through repetitive manual tasks. In addition, there is a strong focus on improving system autonomy going forward to minimize the level of human intervention and setup that is required for optimal performance while drilling with MPD equipment. Ease of scalability for automating this process will also be discussed as it was a major consideration when developing the application.

SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
Precision Research (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Drilling and Well Engineering
2.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.